Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20811343›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2010

Evaluating genome-scale approaches to eukaryotic DNA replication.

David M Gilbert

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Mitigating Cell Cycle Effects in Multi-Omics Data: Solutions and Analytical Frameworks.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Mammalian DNA Replication Timing.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

David M GilbertDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, 32306, USA. gilbert@bio.fsu.edu
Florida A&M University - Florida State University College of Engineering · US

Funding

UNDERSTANDING MECHANISMS OF hESC SELF-RENEWAL AND CELL FATE COMMITMENTP01GM085354 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI DALTON, STEPHEN · 2008 to 2018
$18.3M
Genome Plasticity during ES Cell Differentiation to Neural LineagesR01GM083337 · NIGMS · SAN DIEGO BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI David M Gilbert · 2007 to 2026
$6.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM085354NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanisms regulating where and when eukaryotic DNA replication initiates remain a mystery. Recently, genome-scale methods have been brought to bear on this problem. The identification of replication origins and their associated proteins in yeasts is a well-integrated investigative tool, but corresponding data sets from multicellular organisms are scarce. By contrast, standardized protocols for evaluating replication timing have generated informative data sets for most eukaryotic systems. Here, I summarize the genome-scale methods that are most frequently used to analyse replication in eukaryotes, the kinds of questions each method can address and the technical hurdles that must be overcome to gain a complete understanding of the nature of eukaryotic replication origins.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA ReplicationEukaryotic CellsGenomeGenomicsHumansModels, GeneticReplication OriginReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID20811343
PMCPMC2962615
OpenAlexW2118683755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.