Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20810922›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

A genetic mosaic approach for neural circuit mapping in Drosophila.

Rudolf A Bohm, William P Welch, Lindsey K Goodnight, Logan W Cox, Leah G Henry, Tyler C Gunter, Hong Bao, Bing Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rudolf A BohmDepartment of Zoology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA. rudibohm@gmail
William P Welch
Lindsey K Goodnight
Logan W Cox
Leah G Henry
Tyler C Gunter
Hong Bao
Bing Zhang
University of Oklahoma · US

Funding

Quantitative Neuroscience: Tools for Bridging Levels of AnalysisT32NS007292 · NINDS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI GINA G TURRIGIANO · 1986 to 2026
$12.7M
Genetics and Cell Biology of Synaptic Development and FunctionR01NS060878 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI ZHANG, BING · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NEUROGENETICS OF DROSOPHILA REPRODUCTIONR01GM021473 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI GRIFFITH, LESLIE C · 1985 to 2007
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM021473NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM21473NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060878NINDS NIH HHS R01NS060878NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007292NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS07292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transgenic manipulation of subsets of brain cells is increasingly used for studying behaviors and their underlying neural circuits. In Drosophila, the GAL4-upstream activating sequence (UAS) binary system is powerful for gene manipulation, but GAL4 expression is often too broad for fine mapping of neural circuits. Here, we describe the development of unique molecular genetic tools to restrict GAL4 expression patterns. Building on the GAL4-UAS system, our method adds two components: a collection of enhancer-trap recombinase, Flippase (ET-FLP), transgenic lines that provide inheritable, reproducible, and tissue-specific FLP and an FRT-dependent GAL80 "flip-in" construct that converts FLP expression into tissue-specific repression of GAL4 by GAL80. By including a UAS-encoded fluorescent protein, circuit morphology can be simultaneously marked while the circuit function is assessed using another UAS transgene. In a proof-of-principle analysis, we applied this ET-FLP-induced intersectional GAL80/GAL4 repression (FINGR) method to map the neural circuitry underlying fly wing inflation. The FINGR system is versatile and powerful in combination with the vast collection of GAL4 lines for neural circuit mapping as well as for clonal analysis based on the infusion of the yeast-derived FRT/FLP system of mitotic recombination into Drosophila. The strategies and tactics underlying our FINGR system are also applicable to other genetically amenable organisms in which transgenes including the GAL4, UAS, GAL80, and FLP factors can be applied.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDrosophila melanogasterGene Regulatory NetworksMitosisNeuronsWings, Animal

Identifiers

PMID20810922
PMCPMC2941334
OpenAlexW2108634846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.