Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20810768›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2010

secA1 gene sequence polymorphisms for species identification of Nocardia species and recognition of intraspecies genetic diversity.

Fanrong Kong, Huiping Wang, Erqing Zhang, Vitali Sintchenko, Meng Xiao, Tania C Sorrell, Xiaoyou Chen, Sharon C-A Chen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rapid, Easy, and Reliable Identification ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Updated Review onClinical microbiology reviews · 2022
    Review
  7. Epidemiology ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The Complexities of Nocardia Taxonomy and Identification.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Nocardia infections of the face and neck.Current infectious disease reports · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fanrong KongCentre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Huiping Wang
Erqing Zhang
Vitali Sintchenko
Meng Xiao
Tania C Sorrell
Xiaoyou Chen
Sharon C-A Chen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequence analysis of the Nocardia essential secretory protein SecA1 gene (secA1) for species identification of 120 American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and clinical isolates of Nocardia (16 species) was studied in comparison with 5'-end 606-bp 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Species determination by both methods was concordant for all 10 ATCC strains. secA1 gene sequencing provided the same species identification as 16S rRNA gene analysis for 94/110 (85.5%) clinical isolates. However, 40 (42.6%) isolates had sequences with <99.0% similarity to archived secA1 sequences for the species, including 29 Nocardia cyriacigeorgica (96.6 to 98.9% similarity) and 4 Nocardia veterana (91.5 to 98.9% similarity) strains. Discrepant species identification was obtained for 16 (14.5%) clinical isolates, including 13/23 Nocardia nova strains (identified as various Nocardia species by secA1 sequencing) and 1 isolate each of Nocardia abscessus (identified as Nocardia asiatica), Nocardia elegans (Nocardia africana), and Nocardia transvalensis (Nocardia blacklockiae); both secA1 gene sequence analysis and deduced amino acid sequence analysis determined the species to be different from those assigned by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The secA1 locus showed high sequence diversity (66 sequence or genetic types versus 40 16S rRNA gene sequence types), which was highest for N. nova (14 secA1 sequence types), followed by Nocardia farcinica and N. veterana (n = 7 each); there was only a single sequence type among eight Nocardia paucivorans strains. The secA1 locus has potential for species identification as an adjunct to 16S rRNA gene sequencing but requires additional deduced amino acid sequence analysis. It may be a suitable marker for phylogenetic/subtyping studies.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAdenosine TriphosphatasesBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalHumansMembrane Transport ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataNocardiaNocardia InfectionsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSecA ProteinsSEC Translocation ChannelsSequence Analysis, DNAAdenosine TriphosphatasesBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalMembrane Transport ProteinsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSecA ProteinsSEC Translocation Channels

Identifiers

PMID20810768
PMCPMC3020853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.