ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2010
Identification of potential diagnostic markers among Burkholderia cenocepacia and B. multivorans supernatants.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- How new molecular tools can help bugbusters: a Burkholderia cepacia complex outbreak investigation.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2020Observational
- Profiling of Burkholderia cepacia secretome at mid-logarithmic and early-stationary phases of growth.PloS one · 2011Article
- Polyclonal outbreak of bloodstream infections caused by Burkholderia cepacia complex in hematology and bone marrow transplant outpatient units.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao PauloArticle
- Polyclonal outbreak of bacteremia caused by Burkholderia cepacia complex and the presumptive role of ultrasound gel.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious DiseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) are susceptible to chronic respiratory infections with a number of bacterial pathogens. Among them, the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) bacteria, consisting of nine related species, have emerged as problematic CF pathogens due to their antibiotic resistance, incidence of nosocomial infection, and person-to-person transmission. Bcc organisms present the clinical microbiologist with a diagnostic dilemma due to the lack of phenotypic biochemical or growth-related characterization tests that reliably distinguish among these organisms. The complex taxonomy of the Bcc species colonizing the CF respiratory tract makes accurate identification problematic. Despite the clinical implications of Bcc identification, a clinical laboratory differentiation of species within the Bcc is lacking. Additionally, no commercial assays are available to further identify the Bcc species. In the current study, secretory proteins present in the cultured supernatants of Burkholderia cenocepacia and Burkholderia multivorans were analyzed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE), followed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). To assess differential expression, protein spots of B. cenocepacia and B. multivorans that were unique or displayed different intensities were chosen for MALDI-TOF MS analysis. In total, 341 protein spots were detected, of which 23 were unique to each species, demonstrating that potential diagnostic candidates between these two members of the Bcc exist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.