Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20810601›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2010

CoGAPS: an R/C++ package to identify patterns and biological process activity in transcriptomic data.

Elana J Fertig, Jie Ding, Alexander V Favorov, Giovanni Parmigiani, Michael F Ochs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elana J FertigDepartment of Oncology and Division of Oncology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. ejfertig@jhmi.edu
Jie Ding
Alexander V Favorov
Giovanni Parmigiani
Michael F Ochs

Funding

An Open-Source Algorithm Isolating Overlapping Signatures in Microarray DataR21LM009382 · NLM · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI OCHS, MICHAEL F · 2008 to 2009
$444k
Identifying Malignant Cell Signaling from Protein Interactions an Polyomic DataK25CA141053 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FERTIG, ELANA · 2010 to 2014
$419k
NCI NIH HHS K25 CA141053NLM NIH HHS LM009382
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryCoordinated Gene Activity in Pattern Sets (CoGAPS) provides an integrated package for isolating gene expression driven by a biological process, enhancing inference of biological processes from transcriptomic data. CoGAPS improves on other enrichment measurement methods by combining a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) matrix factorization algorithm (GAPS) with a threshold-independent statistic inferring activity on gene sets. The software is provided as open source C++ code built on top of JAGS software with an R interface. AVAILABILITY: The R package CoGAPS and the C++ package GAPS-JAGS are provided open source under the GNU Lesser Public License (GLPL) with a users manual containing installation and operating instructions. CoGAPS is available through Bioconductor and depends on the rjags package available through CRAN to interface CoGAPS with GAPS-JAGS. URL: http://www.cancerbiostats.onc.jhmi.edu/cogaps.cfm .

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionSoftwareComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsMarkov ChainsOligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis

Identifiers

PMID20810601
PMCPMC3025742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.