Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20810277›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2010

Unmet challenges of structural genomics.

Maksymilian Chruszcz, Marcin Domagalski, Tomasz Osinski, Alexander Wlodawer, Wladek Minor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. CMM-An enhanced platform for interactive validation of metal binding sites.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Reduced antigenicity of Omicron lowers host serologic response.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Structural studies of the unusual metal-ion site of the GH124 endoglucanase from Ruminiclostridium thermocellum.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Databases, Repositories, and Other Data Resources in Structural Biology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017
    Review
  14. The impact of structural genomics: the first quindecennial.Journal of structural and functional genomics · 2016
    Review
  15. Safeguarding Structural Data Repositories against Bad Apples.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The future of crystallography in drug discovery.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maksymilian ChruszczDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, 1340 Jefferson Park Avenue, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Marcin Domagalski
Tomasz Osinski
Alexander Wlodawer
Wladek Minor

Funding

The Midwest Center for Structural GenomicsU54GM074942 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI FREMONT, DAVED H. · 2005 to 2009
$51.0M
Protein StructureZIABC010348 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI WLODAWER, ALEXANDER · 2009 to 2025
$27.5M
X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY OF MACROMOLECULESR01GM053163 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MINOR, WLADEK, OTWINOWSKI, ZBYSZEK · 1996 to 2014
$6.3M
Intramural NIH HHSNIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200700058CNIGMS NIH HHS GM53163NIGMS NIH HHS GM74942NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM053163NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM074942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural genomics (SG) programs have developed during the last decade many novel methodologies for faster and more accurate structure determination. These new tools and approaches led to the determination of thousands of protein structures. The generation of enormous amounts of experimental data resulted in significant improvements in the understanding of many biological processes at molecular levels. However, the amount of data collected so far is so large that traditional analysis methods are limiting the rate of extraction of biological and biochemical information from 3D models. This situation has prompted us to review the challenges that remain unmet by SG, as well as the areas in which the potential impact of SG could exceed what has been achieved so far.

Indexed as

AnimalsCrystallizationDrug DiscoveryGenomicsHumansModels, MolecularProteinsSequence Homology, Amino AcidProteins

Identifiers

PMID20810277
PMCPMC3017768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.