Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20810219›Full record

Trial reportPsychoneuroendocrinology2011

Differences in regional brain metabolism associated with specific formulations of hormone therapy in postmenopausal women at risk for AD.

Daniel H S Silverman, Cheri L Geist, Heather A Kenna, Katherine Williams, Tonita Wroolie, Bevin Powers, John Brooks, Natalie L Rasgon

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Precision hormone therapy: identification of positive responders.Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel H S SilvermanUCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, Ahmanson Biological Imaging Clinic, CHS AR-144, University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6942, USA. dsilver@ucla.edu
Cheri L Geist
Heather A Kenna
Katherine Williams
Tonita Wroolie
Bevin Powers
John Brooks
Natalie L Rasgon
Stanford University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

XOLAIR IN SUBJECTS WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE ATOPIC DERMATITIS WITH FOOD ALLERGYM01RR000070 · NCRR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PARSONNET, JULIE · 1985 to 2008
$32.4M
Estrogen Use in Protection from Cognitive DeclineR01AG022008 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RASGON, NATALIE L · 2003 to 2010
$2.5M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000070NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR-00070NIA NIH HHS R01 AG022008NIA NIH HHS R01 AG22008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differential cerebral metabolic effects of various hormone therapy formulations, and their associations with cognitive status, remain to be established. The principal aim of the current study was to assess relationships between regional cerebral metabolism and estrogen-based hormone therapies. Postmenopausal women (n=53) at elevated risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD) were on estrogen-containing hormone therapy for at least one year prior to enrollment in a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Subjects underwent an FDG-PET scan, along with neuropsychological, medical, and demographic assessments at time of enrollment, to be repeated one year following randomization to hormone therapy continuation versus discontinuation, and results from analyses of the baseline assessments are reported here. Across all subjects, years of endogenous estrogen exposure correlated most closely with metabolism in right superior frontal gyrus (p<0.0005). Women taking 17β-estradiol (E) performed three standard deviations higher in verbal memory than women taking conjugated equine estrogen (CEE), and their verbal memory performance positively correlated with metabolism in Wernicke's (p=0.003) and auditory association (p=0.002) areas. Women taking progesterone-plus-estrogen had lower metabolism than women taking unopposed estrogen within the mesial and inferior lateral temporal regions (p<0.0005) and the inferior frontal cortex, contralateral to Broca's area (p<0.0005). In conclusion, particular areas of relatively preserved metabolism were seen in women with more years of endogenous estrogen exposure, as well as in women taking estradiol-based formulations or estrogen therapies unopposed by progesterone, together suggesting regionally specific neuroprotective estrogenic effects.

Indexed as

Estrogen Replacement TherapyAgedAlzheimer DiseaseBrainBrain ChemistryChemistry, PharmaceuticalEstradiolEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)FemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsOrgan SpecificityPositron-Emission TomographyPostmenopauseEstradiolEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID20810219
PMCPMC3021636
OpenAlexW2029936368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.