Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20809355›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2011

Personal attributions for melanoma risk in melanoma-affected patients and family members.

Jennifer Hay, Marco DiBonaventura, Raymond Baser, Nancy Press, Jeanne Shoveller, Deborah Bowen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Randomized controlled trial of a sun protection intervention for children of melanoma survivors.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2013
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Communication by mothers with breast cancer or melanoma with their children.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer HayDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Avenue, Seventh Floor, New York, NY 10022, USA. hayj@mskcc.org
Marco DiBonaventura
Raymond Baser
Nancy Press
Jeanne Shoveller
Deborah Bowen
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Oregon · US

Funding

Communication Intervention with Melanoma FamiliesR01CA107430 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BOWEN, DEBORAH J. · 2004 to 2007
$2.4M
Perception of Gene-Environment Cancer Risks in MelanomaK07CA098106 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI HAY, JENNIFER L · 2003 to 2007
$672k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA098106NCI NIH HHS K07 CA98106NCI NIH HHS R01 CA107430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personal attributions for cancer risk involve factors that individuals believe contribute to their risk for developing cancer. Understanding personal risk attributions for melanoma may dictate gene-environment melanoma risk communication strategies. We examined attributions for melanoma risk in a population-based sample of melanoma survivors, first degree family members, and family members who are also parents (N = 939). We conducted qualitative examination of open-ended risk attributions and logistic regression examining predictors (demographics, family member type, perceived risk) of the attributions reported (ultraviolet radiation [UVR] exposure, heredity/genetics, phenotype, personal melanoma history, miscellaneous). We found a predominance of risk attributions to UVR and heredity/genetics (80 and 45% of the sample, respectively). Those reporting higher education levels were more likely to endorse attributions to heredity/genetics, as well as to phenotype, than those of lower education levels. First-degree relatives and parent family members were more likely to endorse heredity/genetic attributions than melanoma survivors; melanoma survivors were more likely to endorse personal history of melanoma attributions compared to first-degree relatives and parent family members. These findings inform the development of risk communication interventions for melanoma families.

Indexed as

Family HealthHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSkin NeoplasmsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID20809355
PMCPMC3026094
OpenAlexW2069100772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.