Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20809256›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2011

Cord blood stem cells for hematopoietic transplantation.

Anfisa Stanevsky, Avichai Shimoni, Ronit Yerushalmi, Arnon Nagler

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anfisa StanevskyHematology Division, Chaim Sheba Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Avichai Shimoni
Ronit Yerushalmi
Arnon Nagler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cord blood (CB) is an important alternative source of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) for transplantation today. The principal drawbacks of cord blood transplantation are the limited number of hematopoietic stem cells and a long time to engraftment. Several promising approaches for engraftment enhancement are under intensive investigation. Such are transplantation with two cord blood units, co transplantation of cord blood and haploidentical HSCs and different methods for expansion of cord blood hematopoietic stem cells. In addition there are several ways for improving of homing of HSCs such as co- infusion of CB hematopoietic stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells, administration of parathyroid hormone (PTH), intra- bone transplantation and targeting the CXCR4/SDF1 system. These strategies are expected to increase the availability of transplantation to adults, for whom the chance to find a cord blood suitable for a single unit transplant is small. Recent advances in elucidation of the molecular mechanisms responsible for the proliferation and self-renewal of hematopoietic stem cells may bring further improvement of the outcomes of cord blood transplantation. This review summarizes the recent progress in the field of cord blood derived hematopoietic stem cells. It presents the strategies applied and points out directions for the future.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem CellsAnimalsBone and BonesChemokine CXCL12Coculture TechniquesCord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationFetal BloodHaplotypesHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationParathyroid HormoneReceptors, CXCR4Chemokine CXCL12CXCR4 protein, humanParathyroid HormoneReceptors, CXCR4

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.