Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20808973›Full record

GuidelineCanadian respiratory journal

Optimizing pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease--practical issues: a Canadian Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline.

Darcy D Marciniuk, Dina Brooks, Scott Butcher, Richard Debigare, Gail Dechman, Gordon Ford, Veronique Pepin, Darlene Reid, Andrew W Sheel, Micheal K Stickland and 13 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readPractice GuidelineSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Guideline in Canadian respiratory journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01933308 naterminatednot on this map

Optimization of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programmes: the OPTION Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorVéronique PépinRan2008 to 2012Enrolled36ConditionsCOPDArmsContinuous high intensity training-CT80, Training at ventilatory threshold-CTVT, Interval training-IT
NCT06304207 naunknown statusnot on this map

Comparison of Telehealth and Onsite Supervised Maintenance Exercise Program for Adults With Chronic Lung Disease: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMGH Institute of Health ProfessionsRan2023 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsCopd, COPD Exacerbation, COPD Bronchitis, Emphysema or COPDArmsOnsite Maintenance Exercise Training, Telehealth Maintenance Exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. German recommendations for physical activity and physical activity promotion in adults with noncommunicable diseases.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A primary care medical home approach to pulmonary rehabilitation.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Exploring transitions in care from pulmonary rehabilitation to home for persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A descriptive qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Darcy D MarciniukUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. ctsinfo@lung.ca
Dina Brooks
Scott Butcher
Richard Debigare
Gail Dechman
Gordon Ford
Veronique Pepin
Darlene Reid
Andrew W Sheel
Micheal K Stickland
David C Todd
Shannon L Walker
Shawn D Aaron
Meyer Balter
Jean Bourbeau
Paul Hernandez
Francois Maltais
Denis E O'Donnell
Donna Bleakney
Brian Carlin
Roger Goldstein
Stella K Muthuri
Canadian Thoracic Society COPD Committee Expert Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) participation is the standard of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who remain symptomatic despite bronchodilator therapies. However, there are questions about specific aspects of PR programming including optimal site of rehabilitation delivery, components of rehabilitation programming, duration of rehabilitation, target populations and timing of rehabilitation. The present document was compiled to specifically address these important clinical issues, using an evidence-based, systematic review process led by a representative interprofessional panel of experts. The evidence reveals there are no differences in major patient-related outcomes of PR between nonhospital- (community or home sites) or hospital-based sites. There is strong support to recommend that COPD patients initiate PR within one month following an acute exacerbation due to benefits of improved dyspnea, exercise tolerance and health-related quality of life relative to usual care. Moreover, the benefits of PR are evident in both men and women, and in patients with moderate, severe and very severe COPD. The current review also suggests that longer PR programs, beyond six to eight weeks duration, be provided for COPD patients, and that while aerobic training is the foundation of PR, endurance and functional ability may be further improved with both aerobic and resistance training.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMalePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveResistance TrainingSex FactorsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID20808973
PMCPMC2933771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.