Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20808922›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Hybrid models identified a 12-gene signature for lung cancer prognosis and chemoresponse prediction.

Ying-Wooi Wan, Ebrahim Sabbagh, Rebecca Raese, Yong Qian, Dajie Luo, James Denvir, Val Vallyathan, Vincent Castranova, Nancy Lan Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A three gene-based risk score predicts prognosis of resected non-small-cell lung cancer.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ying-Wooi WanMary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America.
Ebrahim Sabbagh
Rebecca Raese
Yong Qian
Dajie Luo
James Denvir
Val Vallyathan
Vincent Castranova
Nancy Lan Guo

Funding

WVU &MU NEW FACULTY GRANTSP20RR016477 · NCRR · MARSHALL UNIVERSITY · PI RANKIN, GARY O · 2001 to 2011
$35.5M
THE ROLE OF HEF1 PROTEIN IN INVASION OF METASTATIC BREAST CANCERP20RR016440 · NCRR · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI CUFF, CHRISTOPHER F · 2001 to 2010
$22.8M
A Novel Computational Framework for Individualized Clinical Decision-MakingR01LM009500 · NLM · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI GUO, NANCY LAN · 2008 to 2010
$987k
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016440NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016477NCRR NIH HHS P20RR16440NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009500NLM NIH HHS R01LM009500PHS HHS NIH/NCRR P2016477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The recurrence rate ranges from 35-50% among early stage non-small cell lung cancer patients. To date, there is no fully-validated and clinically applied prognostic gene signature for personalized treatment. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsFrom genome-wide mRNA expression profiles generated on 256 lung adenocarcinoma patients, a 12-gene signature was identified using combinatorial gene selection methods, and a risk score algorithm was developed with Naïve Bayes. The 12-gene model generates significant patient stratification in the training cohort HLM & UM (n = 256; log-rank P = 6.96e-7) and two independent validation sets, MSK (n = 104; log-rank P = 9.88e-4) and DFCI (n = 82; log-rank P = 2.57e-4), using Kaplan-Meier analyses. This gene signature also stratifies stage I and IB lung adenocarcinoma patients into two distinct survival groups (log-rank P<0.04). The 12-gene risk score is more significant (hazard ratio = 4.19, 95% CI: [2.08, 8.46]) than other commonly used clinical factors except tumor stage (III vs. I) in multivariate Cox analyses. The 12-gene model is more accurate than previously published lung cancer gene signatures on the same datasets. Furthermore, this signature accurately predicts chemoresistance/chemosensitivity to Cisplatin, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, Etoposide, Erlotinib, and Gefitinib in NCI-60 cancer cell lines (P<0.017). The identified 12 genes exhibit curated interactions with major lung cancer signaling hallmarks in functional pathway analysis. The expression patterns of the signature genes have been confirmed in RT-PCR analyses of independent tumor samples. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results demonstrate the clinical utility of the identified gene signature in prognostic categorization. With this 12-gene risk score algorithm, early stage patients at high risk for tumor recurrence could be identified for adjuvant chemotherapy; whereas stage I and II patients at low risk could be spared the toxic side effects of chemotherapeutic drugs.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingModels, BiologicalAdenocarcinomaAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleGenetic MarkersHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionAntineoplastic AgentsGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID20808922
PMCPMC2923187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.