ArticlePLoS computational biology2010
Dendritic spikes amplify the synaptic signal to enhance detection of motion in a simulation of the direction-selective ganglion cell.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unraveling the role of asymmetric excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs to retinal ganglion cell direction selectivity.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Dendrites endow artificial neural networks with accurate, robust and parameter-efficient learning.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Dendrites endow artificial neural networks with accurate, robust and parameter-efficient learning.ArXiv · 2024Article
- Optimization in Visual Motion Estimation.Annual review of vision science · 2024Review
- Transformation of Motion Pattern Selectivity from Retina to Superior Colliculus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Spike desensitisation as a mechanism for high-contrast selectivity in retinal ganglion cells.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023Article
- Article
- Distinct inhibitory pathways control velocity and directional tuning in the mouse retina.Current biology : CB · 2022Article
- Gain control by sparse, ultra-slow glycinergic synapses.Cell reports · 2022Article
- Type-specific dendritic integration in mouse retinal ganglion cells.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Article
- Retinal direction selectivity in the absence of asymmetric starburst amacrine cell responses.eLife · 2019Article
- Directional excitatory input to direction-selective ganglion cells in the rabbit retina.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2019Article
- Stimulus-dependent engagement of neural mechanisms for reliable motion detection in the mouse retina.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018Review
- Cholinergic excitation complements glutamate in coding visual information in retinal ganglion cells.The Journal of physiology · 2018Article
- Heterocellular Coupling Between Amacrine Cells and Ganglion Cells.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2018Article
- Dendro-dendritic cholinergic excitation controls dendritic spike initiation in retinal ganglion cells.Nature communications · 2017Article
- Time course of EPSCs in ON-type starburst amacrine cells is independent of dendritic location.The Journal of physiology · 2016Article
- Article
- Conditional Knock-Out of Vesicular GABA Transporter Gene from Starburst Amacrine Cells Reveals the Contributions of Multiple Synaptic Mechanisms Underlying Direction Selectivity in the Retina.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The On-Off direction-selective ganglion cell (DSGC) in mammalian retinas responds most strongly to a stimulus moving in a specific direction. The DSGC initiates spikes in its dendritic tree, which are thought to propagate to the soma with high probability. Both dendritic and somatic spikes in the DSGC display strong directional tuning, whereas somatic PSPs (postsynaptic potentials) are only weakly directional, indicating that spike generation includes marked enhancement of the directional signal. We used a realistic computational model based on anatomical and physiological measurements to determine the source of the enhancement. Our results indicate that the DSGC dendritic tree is partitioned into separate electrotonic regions, each summing its local excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs to initiate spikes. Within each local region the local spike threshold nonlinearly amplifies the preferred response over the null response on the basis of PSP amplitude. Using inhibitory conductances previously measured in DSGCs, the simulation results showed that inhibition is only sufficient to prevent spike initiation and cannot affect spike propagation. Therefore, inhibition will only act locally within the dendritic arbor. We identified the role of three mechanisms that generate directional selectivity (DS) in the local dendritic regions. First, a mechanism for DS intrinsic to the dendritic structure of the DSGC enhances DS on the null side of the cell's dendritic tree and weakens it on the preferred side. Second, spatially offset postsynaptic inhibition generates robust DS in the isolated dendritic tips but weak DS near the soma. Third, presynaptic DS is apparently necessary because it is more robust across the dendritic tree. The pre- and postsynaptic mechanisms together can overcome the local intrinsic DS. These local dendritic mechanisms can perform independent nonlinear computations to make a decision, and there could be analogous mechanisms within cortical circuitry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.