ArticlePLoS genetics2010
The transcriptomes of two heritable cell types illuminate the circuit governing their differentiation.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
107 citing papers in PubMed, 158 citations in OpenAlex.
- The transcriptional repressor Ssn6 modulates phase separation to regulate fungal gene expression.mBio · 2026Article
- Response ofmSphere · 2026Article
- Genetic and environmental control of parasexual reproduction in the pathogenicMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025Review
- Shared metabolism between a bacterial and fungal species that reside in the human gut.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Gene dosage and protein valency impact phase separation and fungal cell fate.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Article
- White-opaque switching inMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024Review
- Strain background ofMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2024Article
- Direct RNA sequencing coupled with adaptive sampling enriches RNAs of interest in the transcriptome.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Filamentation and biofilm formation are regulated by the phase-separation capacity of network transcription factors in Candida albicans.PLoS pathogens · 2023Article
- Article
- Cell-type memory in a single-cell eukaryote requires the continuous presence of a specific transcription regulator.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Glucose depletion enables Candida albicans mating independently of the epigenetic white-opaque switch.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Farnesol and phosphorylation of the transcriptional regulator Efg1 affect Candida albicans white-opaque switching rates.PloS one · 2023Article
- Multiple molecular events underlie stochastic switching between 2 heritable cell states in fungi.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- Review
- Role of themBio · 2021Article
- The Glyoxylate Cycle Is Involved in White-Opaque Switching inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- Recording of DNA-binding events reveals the importance of a repurposed Candida albicans regulatory network for gut commensalism.Cell host & microbe · 2021Article
47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The differentiation of cells into distinct cell types, each of which is heritable for many generations, underlies many biological phenomena. White and opaque cells of the fungal pathogen Candida albicans are two such heritable cell types, each thought to be adapted to unique niches within their human host. To systematically investigate their differences, we performed strand-specific, massively-parallel sequencing of RNA from C. albicans white and opaque cells. With these data we first annotated the C. albicans transcriptome, finding hundreds of novel differentially-expressed transcripts. Using the new annotation, we compared differences in transcript abundance between the two cell types with the genomic regions bound by a master regulator of the white-opaque switch (Wor1). We found that the revised transcriptional landscape considerably alters our understanding of the circuit governing differentiation. In particular, we can now resolve the poor concordance between binding of a master regulator and the differential expression of adjacent genes, a discrepancy observed in several other studies of cell differentiation. More than one third of the Wor1-bound differentially-expressed transcripts were previously unannotated, which explains the formerly puzzling presence of Wor1 at these positions along the genome. Many of these newly identified Wor1-regulated genes are non-coding and transcribed antisense to coding transcripts. We also find that 5' and 3' UTRs of mRNAs in the circuit are unusually long and that 5' UTRs often differ in length between cell-types, suggesting UTRs encode important regulatory information and that use of alternative promoters is widespread. Further analysis revealed that the revised Wor1 circuit bears several striking similarities to the Oct4 circuit that specifies the pluripotency of mammalian embryonic stem cells. Additional characteristics shared with the Oct4 circuit suggest a set of general hallmarks characteristic of heritable differentiation states in eukaryotes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.