ArticleJournal of applied behavior analysis2010
Consistent visual analyses of intrasubject data.
Article in Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing Available Evidence in Single-Case Experimental Studies: The Use of Multilevel Meta-Analysis.Psychologica Belgica · 2024Review
- Slope Identification and Decision Making: A Comparison of Linear and Ratio Graphs.Behavior modification · 2023Article
- Implementing Automated Nonparametric Statistical Analysis on Functional Analysis Data: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers.Perspectives on behavior science · 2022Article
- Machine learning to analyze single-case graphs: A comparison to visual inspection.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2021Article
- Informal versus formal judgment of statistical models: The case of normality assumptions.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2021Review
- How Many Tiers Do We Need? Type I Errors and Power in Multiple Baseline Designs.Perspectives on behavior science · 2020Article
- Randomization Tests for Single Case Designs with Rapidly Alternating Conditions: An Analysis ofPerspectives on behavior science · 2019Article
- Systematic Protocols for the Visual Analysis of Single-Case Research Data.Behavior analysis in practice · 2019Article
- Predictive validity and efficiency of ongoing visual-inspection criteria for interpreting functional analyses.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2018Article
- TummyTrials: A Feasibility Study of Using Self-Experimentation to Detect Individualized Food Triggers.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2017Article
- A framework for self-experimentation in personalized health.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016Article
- Using ultrasound visual feedback to remediate velar fronting in preschool children: A pilot study.Clinical linguistics & phonetics · 2016Article
- Optimizing behavioral health interventions with single-case designs: from development to dissemination.Translational behavioral medicine · 2014Article
- Data-based decision making: the impact of data variability, training, and context.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual inspection of single-case data is the primary method of interpretation of the effects of an independent variable on a dependent variable in applied behavior analysis. The purpose of the current study was to replicate and extend the results of DeProspero and Cohen (1979) by reexamining the consistency of visual analysis across raters. We recruited members of the board of editors and associate editors for the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis to judge graphs on a 100-point scale of experimental control and by providing a dichotomous response (i.e., "yes" or "no" for experimental control). Results showed high interrater agreement across the three types of graphs, suggesting that visual inspection can lead to consistent interpretation of single-case data among well-trained raters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.