Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20808443›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Analysis of death receptor 5 and caspase-8 expression in primary and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and their prognostic impact.

Heath A Elrod, Songqing Fan, Susan Muller, Georgia Z Chen, Lin Pan, Mourad Tighiouart, Dong M Shin, Fadlo R Khuri, Shi-Yong Sun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Circadian (De)regulation in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Fas expression is downregulated in gastric cancer.Molecular medicine reports · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heath A ElrodDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine and Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Songqing Fan
Susan Muller
Georgia Z Chen
Lin Pan
Mourad Tighiouart
Dong M Shin
Fadlo R Khuri
Shi-Yong Sun
Winship Cancer InstituteEmory University · US

Funding

TARGETING DEATH RECEPTOR-MEDIATED APOPTOSIS FOR HEAD AND NECK CANCERP50CA128613 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ROGATKO, ANDRE · 2007 to 2011
$12.0M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA128613NCI NIH HHS P50CA128613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Death receptor 5 (DR5) and caspase-8 are major components in the extrinsic apoptotic pathway. The alterations of the expression of these proteins during the metastasis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and their prognostic impact have not been reported. The present study analyzes the expression of DR5 and caspase-8 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in primary and metastatic HNSCCs and their impact on patient survival. Tumor samples in this study included 100 primary HNSCC with no evidence of metastasis, 100 primary HNSCC with lymph node metastasis (LNM) and 100 matching LNM. IHC analysis revealed a significant loss or downregulation of DR5 expression in primary tumors with metastasis and their matching LNM compared to primary tumors with no evidence of metastasis. A similar trend was observed in caspase-8 expression although it was not statistically significant. Downregulation of caspase-8 and DR5 expression was significantly correlated with poorly differentiated tumors compared to moderately and well differentiated tumors. Univariate analysis indicates that, in HNSCC with no metastasis, higher expression of caspase-8 significantly correlated with better disease-free survival and overall survival. However, in HNSCC with LNM, higher caspase-8 expression significantly correlated with poorer disease-free survival and overall survival. Similar results were also generated when we combined both DR5 and caspase-8. Taken together, we suggest that both DR5 and caspase-8 are involved in regulation of HNSCC metastasis. Our findings warrant further investigation on the dual role of caspase-8 in cancer development.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticCarcinoma, Squamous CellCaspase 8FemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansImmunohistochemistryLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisReceptors, TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing LigandSurvival RateCaspase 8Receptors, TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand

Identifiers

PMID20808443
PMCPMC2922336
OpenAlexW2070984758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.