ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2010
Neighbourhood-socioeconomic variation in women's diet: the role of nutrition environments.
Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of the influences of food store product placement on dietary-related outcomes.Nutrition reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Dietary assessment in food environment research: a systematic review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2014Pooled it
- Food subsidy programs and the health and nutritional status of disadvantaged families in high income countries: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2012Pooled it
- The local food environment and diet: a systematic review.Health & place · 2012Pooled it
- Measures of the consumer food store environment: a systematic review of the evidence 2000-2011.Journal of community health · 2012Pooled it
- A Community-Based Intervention Program's Effects on Dietary Intake Behaviors.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2017Trial
- How do supermarkets shape the experience of vulnerable people in Australia's food system? A scoping review.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2026Article
- Association between density of food retailers and fitness centers and gestational diabetes mellitus in Eastern Massachusetts, USA: population-based study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2024Article
- Identifying the barriers and facilitators to fruit and vegetable consumption in rural Australian adults: a mixed methods analysis.Nutrition journal · 2024Article
- The association between physical activities combined with dietary habits and cardiovascular risk factors.Heliyon · 2024Article
- BMI and the Food Retail Environment in Melbourne, Australia: Associations and Temporal Trends.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Adult food choices in association with the local retail food environment and food access in resource-poor communities: a scoping review.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Can Ordering Groceries Online Support Diet Quality in Adults Who Live in Low Food Access and Low-Income Environments?Nutrients · 2023Article
- Regional Living Conditions and Individual Dietary Characteristics of the Russian Population.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Preferences of women with a vulnerable health status towards nudging for adequate pregnancy preparation as investment in health of future generations: a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Article
- Associations of Education With Overall Diet Quality Are Explained by Different Food Groups in Middle-aged and Old Japanese Women.Journal of epidemiology · 2021Article
- Healthy Food Density is Not Associated With Diet Quality Among Pregnant Women With Overweight/Obesity in South Carolina.Journal of nutrition education and behavior · 2021Article
- A Spatial Analysis of Access to Physical Activity Infrastructure and Healthy Food in Regional Tasmania.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesLiving in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods is associated with increased risk of a poor diet; however, the mechanisms underlying associations are not well understood. This study investigated whether selected healthy and unhealthy dietary behaviours are patterned by neighbourhood-socioeconomic disadvantage, and if so, whether features of the neighbourhood-nutrition environment explain these associations. SUBJECTS/
methodsA survey was completed by 1399 women from 45 neighbourhoods of varying levels of socioeconomic disadvantage in Melbourne, Australia. Survey data on fruit, vegetable and fast-food consumption were linked with data on food store locations (supermarket, greengrocer and fast-food store density and proximity) and within-store factors (in-store data on price and availability for supermarkets and greengrocers) obtained through objective audits. Multilevel regression analyses were used to examine associations of neighbourhood disadvantage with fruit, vegetable and fast-food consumption, and to test whether nutrition environment factors mediated these associations.
resultsAfter controlling for individual-level demographic and socioeconomic factors, neighbourhood disadvantage was associated with less vegetable consumption and more fast-food consumption, but not with fruit consumption. Some nutrition environmental factors were associated with both neighbourhood disadvantage and with diet. Nutrition environmental features did not mediate neighbourhood-disadvantage variations in vegetable or fast-food consumption.
conclusionsAlthough we found poorer diets among women living in disadvantaged neighbourhoods in Melbourne, the differences were not attributable to less supportive nutrition environments in these neighbourhoods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20808330What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.