Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20807187›Full record

ReviewCurrent computer-aided drug design2011

Recent advances in ligand-based drug design: relevance and utility of the conformationally sampled pharmacophore approach.

Chayan Acharya, Andrew Coop, James E Polli, Alexander D Mackerell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current computer-aided drug design, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Open-Sourced In Silico Drug Screening.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Investigation ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chayan AcharyaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, 20 Penn Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Andrew Coop
James E Polli
Alexander D Mackerell

Funding

University of Maryland Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and InnovationU01FD005946 · FDA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI BENTLEY, WILLIAM E., POLLI, JAMES E · 2016 to 2025
$21.5M
OPIOIDS WITH DELTA ANTAGONIST AND MU AGONIST ACTIVITYR01DA013583 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI COOP, ANDREW · 2001 to 2012
$2.5M
Substrate requirements of the bile acid transporterR01DK067530 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI POLLI, JAMES E · 2005 to 2009
$1.4M
Reversing the toxic effects of drugs of abuseK02DA019634 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI COOP, ANDREW · 2005 to 2009
$528k
FDA HHS U01 FD005946NIDA NIH HHS DA13583NIDA NIH HHS DA19634NIDA NIH HHS K02 DA019634NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013583NIDDK NIH HHS DK67530NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK067530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the absence of three-dimensional (3D) structures of potential drug targets, ligand-based drug design is one of the popular approaches for drug discovery and lead optimization. 3D structure-activity relationships (3D QSAR) and pharmacophore modeling are the most important and widely used tools in ligand-based drug design that can provide crucial insights into the nature of the interactions between drug target and ligand molecule and provide predictive models suitable for lead compound optimization. This review article will briefly discuss the features and potential application of recent advances in ligand-based drug design, with emphasis on a detailed description of a novel 3D QSAR method based on the conformationally sample pharmacophore (CSP) approach (denoted CSP-SAR). In addition, data from a published study are used to compare the CSP-SAR approach to the Catalyst method, emphasizing the utility of the CSP approach for ligand-based model development.

Indexed as

Computer-Aided DesignDrug Delivery SystemsDrug DesignHumansLigandsModels, MolecularQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipLigands

Identifiers

PMID20807187
PMCPMC2975775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.