Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20806349›Full record

Trial reportCancer2011

Self-administered, subcutaneous alemtuzumab to treat residual disease in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

William G Wierda, Thomas J Kipps, Michael J Keating, Jennifer R Brown, John G Gribben, Mary Browning, Laura Z Rassenti, Andrew W Greaves, Donna Neuberg, Susan M O'Brien and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Alemtuzumab for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. What do we do with chronic lymphocytic leukemia with 17p deletion?Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2013
    Review
  5. Therapeutic antibodies against cancer.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2012
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Treatment options for high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2011
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

William G WierdaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Thomas J Kipps
Michael J Keating
Jennifer R Brown
John G Gribben
Mary Browning
Laura Z Rassenti
Andrew W Greaves
Donna Neuberg
Susan M O'Brien
CLL Research Consortium
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Tissue CoreP01CA081534 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KIPPS, THOMAS J · 2000 to 2016
$59.5M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA081534NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlemtuzumab is highly effective at treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in bone marrow, which is the usual site of residual disease after fludarabine-based treatment. Eliminating residual disease potentially is associated with longer remission and overall survival. The authors of this report evaluated the ability of subcutaneous alemtuzumab to treat residual disease.

methodsPatients in partial remission (PR), nodular PR (nPR), or complete remission (CR) who had disease in bone marrow established by 2-color flow cytometry analysis were enrolled and received alemtuzumab 30 mg subcutaneously 3 times weekly for 4 weeks, and patients had the option to self-administer alemtuzumab. Responders were patients in PR who converted to an nPR or a CR, patients in nPR who converted to a CR, and patients in CR who had no evidence of disease on 2-color flow cytometry analysis after treatment.

resultsThere were 31 patients enrolled, of whom 29 were evaluable, and there were 23 responders (4 of 4 patients who achieved a CR, 8 of 9 patients who achieved an nPR, and 11 of 16 patients who achieved a PR. Nonresponders had significantly lower plasma alemtuzumab levels at the end of treatment. Furthermore, higher plasma alemtuzumab levels at the end of treatment were correlated with a longer response duration. Compared with the results from an historic group that received intravenous alemtuzumab for residual disease, there was a trend toward a higher response rate but a shorter response duration with subcutaneous alemtuzumab.

conclusionsThe current results demonstrated that self-administered, subcutaneous alemtuzumab was safe and active for residual disease and that plasma alemtuzumab levels and real-time minimal residual disease evaluation are important endpoints to monitor in future alemtuzumab consolidation trials.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlemtuzumabAnemiaAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsHumansInjections, IntravenousInjections, SubcutaneousLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellMiddle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualNeutropeniaAlemtuzumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeoplasmAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID20806349
PMCPMC4535917
OpenAlexW2086011350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.