Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20803285›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2010

Radiobiological comparison of hypofractionated accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) and single-dose intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with 50-kV X-rays.

Carsten Herskind, Frederik Wenz

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01440010 (TARGeted Intraoperative radioTherapy With the INTRABEAM-System as an Advanced Boost in Patients With Breast Cancer - A Quality Control Registry in Germany), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01440010 completednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

TARGeted Intraoperative radioTherapy With the INTRABEAM-System as an Advanced Boost in Patients With Breast Cancer - A Quality Control Registry in Germany (TARGIT BQR)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversitätsmedizin MannheimRan2011 to 2020Enrolled1,133ConditionsBreast CancerArmsIORT with 20 Gy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Present state and issues in IORT Physics.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2017
    Review
  9. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as boost in breast cancer.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2017
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation in Clinical Practice.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Review
  13. Intraoperative Period and Breast Cancer: Review.The journal of breast health · 2014
    Review
  14. Boost IORT in Breast Cancer: Body of Evidence.International journal of breast cancer · 2014
    Review
  15. [Rules and regulations applying to incidents in radiotherapy].Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Topical use of a silymarin-based preparation to prevent radiodermatitis : results of a prospective study in breast cancer patients.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carsten HerskindDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany. carsten.herskind@medma.uni-heidelberg.de
Frederik Wenz
University Medical Centre Mannheim · DEUniversity of Mannheim · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeIntraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) of the tumor bed in early breast cancer is presently performed with a single dose of 50-kV X-rays from a miniaturized X-ray machine using spherical applicators. The purpose was to model the biological effect of hypofractionated accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) with ten fractions. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe relative biologic effectiveness (RBE) was estimated from the linear-quadratic (L-Q) formalism including repair of sublethal damage or assuming a constant RBE = 1.2-1.5. The radial distribution of biological effect was assessed from clinical dose-response curves. In accordance with clinical convention, the dose for APBI was prescribed at 1 cm depth in the tumor bed, whereas for IORT it was prescribed at the applicator surface.

resultsThe fraction size was fitted to give the same risk of late normal-tissue reaction (fibrosis) as single-dose IORT with a maximum dose of 20 Gy. The isoeffective fraction size at 1 cm depth varied between 1.01 Gy for RBE estimated from the L-Q model and 1.64 Gy for constant RBE. The applicator size and dose prescription point influenced the radial dose distribution. The "sphere of equivalence" within which the risk for local recurrence is the same for whole-breast radiotherapy was predicted to extend to 11-15 mm distance from the applicator for alpha/beta = 10 Gy and 9-13 mm for alpha/beta = 4 Gy for hypofractionated APBI, representing an increase of the sphere of equivalence by 2.5-6 mm relative to single-dose IORT.

conclusionAn increase of the therapeutic window with hypofractionated APBI relative to single-dose IORT should be feasible.

Indexed as

Dose Fractionation, RadiationBrachytherapyBreastBreast NeoplasmsDose-Response Relationship, RadiationEquipment DesignFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMastectomyModels, BiologicalRadiation PneumonitisRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRelative Biological Effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID20803285
OpenAlexW1488790639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.