Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20803214›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2011

Biological monitoring of exposure to di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in six French factories: a field study.

R Gaudin, P Marsan, S Ndaw, A Robert, P Ducos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Lifetime cancer risk assessment for inhalation exposure to di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP).Environmental science and pollution research international · 2017
    Article
  3. Occupational exposure to phthalates in relation to gender, consumer practices and body composition.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2016
    Article
  4. Phthalate pollution in an Amazonian rainforest.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Ant cuticular response to phthalate pollution.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2014
    Article
  9. Phthalate exposure and health-related outcomes in specific types of work environment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R GaudinDépartement Polluants et Santé, Institut National de Recherche et de Sécurité, CS 60027, 54519 Vandoeuvre Cedex, France. rene.gaudin@inrs.fr
P Marsan
S Ndaw
A Robert
P Ducos
Institut National de Recherche et de Sécurité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess, by biological monitoring, workers' exposure to di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) in the flexible-PVC industry in France to provide additional occupational exposure data, which are particularly scarce.

methodOver 5 days of pre-and post-shift sampling, three urinary metabolites of DEHP, mono (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP), mono (5-carboxy-2-ethylpentyl) phthalate (5cx-MEPP) and 2-ethylhexanoic acid (2-EHA) were quantified in 62 workers and 29 controls from six factories. Analyses were performed by high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) after on-line extraction.

resultsMedian concentrations of the pre- and post-shift urinary samples in the exposed workers were 12.6 and 28.7 μg/l for MEHP, 38.6 and 84.4 μg/l for 5cx-MEPP and 20.4 and 70.6 μg/l for 2-EHA, respectively. In the controls, the corresponding values were 4.8 and 4.7 μg/l for MEHP, 15.1 and 12.4 μg/l for 5cx-MEPP and 21.8 and 20.5 μg/l for 2-EHA, respectively. There was a significant increase (Mann-Whitney U-test, P < 0.05) of post-shift excretion in the exposed workers versus the unexposed controls and in the post-shift versus pre-shift concentrations only in the exposed workers. Values of 250 and 500 μg/l (100 and 280 μ/g creatinine) for MEHP and 5cx-MEPP, respectively, are proposed as guidance values.

conclusionThere is clear evidence of occupational exposure of workers in these factories. The guideline values proposed should prevent high exposures in the soft PVC industry, particularly in factories where DEHP compounds or plastisols are employed. An epidemiological survey is needed to complete the DEHP risk assessment.

Indexed as

CaproatesChemical IndustryDiethylhexyl PhthalateEnvironmental MonitoringFemaleFranceHumansMaleOccupational ExposurePhthalic AcidsPlasticizers2-ethylhexanoic acidCaproatesDiethylhexyl Phthalatemono(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalatemono-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalatePhthalic AcidsPlasticizers

Identifiers

PMID20803214
OpenAlexW1977591635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.