Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20803165›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2010

Bibliotherapy as a treatment for depression in primary care.

Elizabeth V Naylor, David O Antonuccio, Mark Litt, Gary E Johnson, Daniel R Spogen, Richard Williams, Catherine McCarthy, Marcia M Lu, David C Fiore, Dianne L Higgins

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth V NaylorDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Brigham Building (MS 316), Reno, NV 89557-0169, USA. enaylor@medicine.nevada.edu
David O Antonuccio
Mark Litt
Gary E Johnson
Daniel R Spogen
Richard Williams
Catherine McCarthy
Marcia M Lu
David C Fiore
Dianne L Higgins
University of Nevada, Reno · USTahoe Forest Hospital · USUConn Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was designed to determine whether a physician-delivered bibliotherapy prescription would compare favorably with the prevailing usual care treatment for depression in primary care (that often involves medication) and potentially offer an alternative. Six family physicians were trained to write and deliver prescriptions for cognitive-behavioral bibliotherapy. Thirty-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive either usual care or a behavioral prescription to read the self-help book, Feeling Good (Burns, D. D. (1999). Feeling good: The new mood therapy. New York: HarperCollins). The treatment groups did not differ in terms of overall outcome variables. Patients in both treatment groups reported statistically significant decreases in depression symptoms, decreases in dysfunctional attitudes, and increases in quality of life. Although not statistically significant, the mean net medical expenses in the behavioral prescription group were substantially less. This study provided empirical evidence that a behavioral prescription for Feeling Good may be as effective as standard care, which commonly involves an antidepressant prescription.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAntidepressive AgentsBibliotherapyCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressive DisorderFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePatient SatisfactionPrimary Health CarePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID20803165
OpenAlexW2058389564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.