ArticleDer Nervenarzt2010
[Evidence-based therapy of depression: S3 guidelines on unipolar depression].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05477420 (A Survey Study and Effect of Web-based Decision Aids on Preferences Shift), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Survey Study and Effect of Web-based Decision Aids on Preferences Shift
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient involvement in developing a patient-targeted feedback intervention after depression screening in primary care within the randomized controlled trial GET.FEEDBACK.GP.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Trial
- Adherence to Established Treatment Guidelines Among Unguided Digital Interventions for Depression: Quality Evaluation of 28 Web-Based Programs and Mobile Apps.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Combination of agomelatine and bupropion for treatment-resistant depression: results from a chart review study including a matched control group.Brain and behavior · 2015Article
- Insular and hippocampal gray matter volume reductions in patients with major depressive disorder.PloS one · 2014Article
- Depressive syndromes in neurological disorders.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2013Review
- CAM in Psychiatry.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2013Article
- [Depression and neurological diseases].Der Nervenarzt · 2012Review
- [A new evidence and consensus-based German guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of bipolar disorders].Der Nervenarzt · 2012Article
- Depression, Comorbidities, and Prescriptions of Antidepressants in a German Network of GPs and Specialists with Subspecialisation in Anthroposophic Medicine: A Longitudinal Observational Study.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unipolar depressive disorders are among the most frequent reasons for utilizing the health care system. Although efficacious treatments are available and further advances have recently been made there is still a need for improving diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Alignment of treatment on evidence-based treatment guidelines establishes an essential mainstay. The new S3 and National Health Care guidelines on unipolar depression, the compilation of which was coordinated by the German Society of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Neurology (DGPPN) and which were approved by 29 scientific and professional associations, is the ambitious effort to present state of the art evidence and clinical consensus for the treatment of depression. For pharmacotherapy of depression differentiated recommendations can be given, also separate from and in addition to psychotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20802992What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.