Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20802480›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2010

The ratio of human X chromosome to autosome diversity is positively correlated with genetic distance from genes.

Michael F Hammer, August E Woerner, Fernando L Mendez, Joseph C Watkins, Murray P Cox, Jeffrey D Wall

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Complex patterns of sex-biased demography in canines.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genetic Diversity on the Sex Chromosomes.Genome biology and evolution · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Explosive genetic evidence for explosive human population growth.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2016
    Review
  18. Determinants of genetic diversity.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael F HammerArizona Research Laboratories, Division of Biotechnology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA. mfh@email.arizona.edu
August E Woerner
Fernando L Mendez
Joseph C Watkins
Murray P Cox
Jeffrey D Wall

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ratio of X-linked to autosomal diversity was estimated from an analysis of six human genome sequences and found to deviate from the expected value of 0.75. However, the direction of this deviation depends on whether a particular sequence is close to or far from the nearest gene. This pattern may be explained by stronger locally acting selection on X-linked genes compared with autosomal genes, combined with larger effective population sizes for females than for males.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, XEvolution, MolecularFemaleGenes, X-LinkedGenetic VariationHumansLinkage DisequilibriumMaleModels, GeneticReproductionSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID20802480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.