Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20802465›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2010

Array-based comparative genomic hybridization in ulcerative colitis neoplasia: single non-dysplastic biopsies distinguish progressors from non-progressors.

Mary P Bronner, Marek Skacel, David A Crispin, Peter D Hoff, Mary J Emond, Lisa A Lai, Raymond R Tubbs, Jacintha N O'Sullivan, Peter S Rabinovitch, Teresa A Brentnall

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Biomarkers for colitis-associated colorectal cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Mary P BronnerDivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. bronnem@ccf.org
Marek Skacel
David A Crispin
Peter D Hoff
Mary J Emond
Lisa A Lai
Raymond R Tubbs
Jacintha N O'Sullivan
Peter S Rabinovitch
Teresa A Brentnall
University of Washington · USCleveland Clinic · USSeattle University · USSt. Vincent's University Hospital · IEUniversitas Nusa Bangsa · ID

Funding

HISTOLOGIC AND MOLECULAR CHANGES IN UC TUMORIGENESISR01CA068124 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRENTNALL, TERESA A · 1995 to 2010
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA068124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 10% of ulcerative colitis patients develop colorectal neoplasia. At present, identification of this subset is markedly limited and necessitates lifelong colonoscopic surveillance for the entire ulcerative colitis population. Better risk markers are needed to focus surveillance onto the patients who are most likely to benefit. Using array-based comparative genomic hybridization, we analyzed single, non-dysplastic biopsies from three patient groups: ulcerative colitis progressors (n=9) with cancer or high-grade dysplasia at a mean distance of 18 cm from the analyzed site; ulcerative colitis non-progressors (n=8) without dysplasia during long-term surveillance; and non-ulcerative colitis normal controls (n=2). Genomic DNA from fresh colonic epithelium purified from stroma was hybridized to 287 (low-density) and 4342 (higher-density) feature bacterial artificial chromosome arrays. Sample-to-reference fluorescence ratios were calculated for individual chromosomal targets and globally across the genome. The low-density arrays yielded pronounced genomic gains and losses in 3 of 9 (33%) ulcerative colitis progressors but in none of the 10 control patients. Identical DNA samples analyzed on the higher-density arrays, using a combination of global and individual high variance assessments, distinguished all nine progressors from all 10 controls. These data confirm that genomic alterations in ulcerative colitis progressors are widespread, even involving single non-dysplastic biopsies that are far distant from neoplasia. They therefore show promise toward eliminating full colonoscopic surveillance with extensive biopsy sampling in the majority of ulcerative colitis patients.

Indexed as

AdultAge of OnsetBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyChildChild, PreschoolChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialColitis, UlcerativeColorectal NeoplasmsComparative Genomic HybridizationDisease ProgressionHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisYoung AdultBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID20802465
PMCPMC2932629
OpenAlexW2033155361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.