Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20802074›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2010

Comparative analysis of myxococcus predation on soil bacteria.

Andrew D Morgan, R Craig MacLean, Kristina L Hillesland, Gregory J Velicer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Sulfonamide resistance geneMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Milestones in the development ofJournal of bacteriology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Fatty acid metabolism and the oxidative stress response support bacterial predation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Predatory Strategies ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew D MorganSchool of Biological Sciences, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH93JT, United Kingdom. andrew.morgan@ed.ac.uk
R Craig MacLean
Kristina L Hillesland
Gregory J Velicer

Funding

Comprehensive analysis of evolutionary mutations in a highly social bacteriumR01GM079690 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI VELICER, GREGORY J · 2007 to 2011
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predator-prey relationships among prokaryotes have received little attention but are likely to be important determinants of the composition, structure, and dynamics of microbial communities. Many species of the soil-dwelling myxobacteria are predators of other microbes, but their predation range is poorly characterized. To better understand the predatory capabilities of myxobacteria in nature, we analyzed the predation performance of numerous Myxococcus isolates across 12 diverse species of bacteria. All predator isolates could utilize most potential prey species to effectively fuel colony expansion, although one species hindered predator swarming relative to a control treatment with no growth substrate. Predator strains varied significantly in their relative performance across prey types, but most variation in predatory performance was determined by prey type, with Gram-negative prey species supporting more Myxococcus growth than Gram-positive species. There was evidence for specialized predator performance in some predator-prey combinations. Such specialization may reduce resource competition among sympatric strains in natural habitats. The broad prey range of the Myxococcus genus coupled with its ubiquity in the soil suggests that myxobacteria are likely to have very important ecological and evolutionary effects on many species of soil prokaryotes.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyBacterial ProteinsCluster AnalysisEndopeptidase ClpHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMolecular Sequence DataMyxococcusSequence Analysis, DNABacterial ProteinsEndopeptidase ClpHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsIsocitrate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID20802074
PMCPMC2953020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.