ArticleJournal of bacteriology2010
Loss of compartmentalization of σ(E) activity need not prevent formation of spores by Bacillus subtilis.
Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Practical observations on the use of fluorescent reporter systems in Clostridioides difficile.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2022Article
- Dual-specificity anti-sigma factor reinforces control of cell-type specific gene expression in Bacillus subtilis.PLoS genetics · 2015Article
- Regulated proteolysis in bacterial development.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2014Review
- Global analysis of the sporulation pathway of Clostridium difficile.PLoS genetics · 2013Article
- A negative feedback loop that limits the ectopic activation of a cell type-specific sporulation sigma factor of Bacillus subtilis.PLoS genetics · 2011Article
- Regulation of growth of the mother cell and chromosome replication during sporulation of Bacillus subtilis.Journal of bacteriology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Compartmentalization of the activities of RNA polymerase sigma factors is a hallmark of formation of spores by Bacillus subtilis. It is initiated soon after the asymmetrically located sporulation division takes place with the activation of σ(F) in the smaller cell, the prespore. σ(F) then directs a signal via the membrane protease SpoIIGA to activate σ(E) in the larger mother cell by processing of pro-σ(E). Here, we show that σ(E) can be activated in the prespore with little effect on sporulation efficiency, implying that complete compartmentalization of σ(E) activity is not essential for spore formation. σ(E) activity in the prespore can be obtained by inducing transcription in the prespore of spoIIGA or of sigE*, which encodes a constitutively active form of σ(E), but not of spoIIGB, which encodes pro-σ(E). We infer that σ(E) compartmentalization is partially attributed to a competition between the compartments for the activation signaling protein SpoIIR. Normally, SpoIIGA is predominantly located in the mother cell and as a consequence confines σ(E) activation to it. In addition, we find that CsfB, previously shown to inhibit σ(G), is independently inhibiting σ(E) activity in the prespore. CsfB thus appears to serve a gatekeeper function in blocking the action of two sigma factors in the prespore: it prevents σ(G) from becoming active before completion of engulfment and helps prevent σ(E) from becoming active at all.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.