Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20799930›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2010

The MATISSE study: a randomised trial of group art therapy for people with schizophrenia.

Mike J Crawford, Helen Killaspy, Eleftheria Kalaitzaki, Barbara Barrett, Sarah Byford, Sue Patterson, Tony Soteriou, Francis A O'Neill, Katie Clayton, Anna Maratos and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
43.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Mike J CrawfordCentre for Mental Health, Imperial College, Claybrook Road London, W6 8LN, UK. m.crawford@imperial.ac.uk
Helen Killaspy
Eleftheria Kalaitzaki
Barbara Barrett
Sarah Byford
Sue Patterson
Tony Soteriou
Francis A O'Neill
Katie Clayton
Anna Maratos
Thomas R Barnes
David Osborn
Tony Johnson
Michael King
Peter Tyrer
Diana Waller
Centre for Mental Health · GBUniversity College London · GBKing's College London · GBAvon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust · GBCamden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust · GBCentral and North West London NHS Foundation Trust · GBFramework · GBImperial College London · GBMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBQueen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

Department of Health 04/39/04Medical Research Council MC_U122797163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArt Therapy has been promoted as a means of helping people who may find it difficult to express themselves verbally engage in psychological treatment. Group Art Therapy has been widely used as an adjunctive treatment for people with schizophrenia but there have been few attempts to examine its effects and cost effectiveness has not been examined. The MATISSE study aims to evaluate the clinical and cost effectiveness of group Art Therapy for people with schizophrenia. METHOD/

designThe MATISSE study is a three-arm, parallel group, pragmatic, randomised, controlled trial of referral to group Art Therapy plus standard care, referral to an attention control 'activity' group plus standard care, or standard care alone. Study participants were recruited from inpatient and community-based mental health and social care services at four centres in England and Northern Ireland. Participants were aged over 18 years with a clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia, confirmed by an examination of case notes using operationalised criteria. Participants were then randomised via an independent and remote telephone randomisation service using permuted stacked blocks, stratified by site. Art Therapy and activity groups were made available to participants once a week for up to 12 months. Outcome measures were assessed by researchers masked to allocation status at 12 and 24 months after randomisation. Participants and care givers were aware which arm of the trial participants were allocated to. The primary outcomes for the study are global functioning (measured using the Global Assessment of Functioning scale) and mental health symptoms (measured using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) assessed at 24 months. Secondary outcomes were assessed at 12 and 24 months and comprise levels of group attendance, social function, satisfaction with care, mental wellbeing, and costs. DISCUSSION: We believe that this is the first large scale pragmatic trial of Art Therapy for people with schizophrenia.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN46150447.

Indexed as

AdultArt TherapyCognition DisordersCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleNorthern IrelandPsychotherapy, GroupSchizophreniaSchizophrenic PsychologyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID20799930
PMCPMC2940860
OpenAlexW2161034093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.