Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20799923›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2010

Inclusion of women and gender-specific analyses in randomized clinical trials of treatments for depression.

Andrea H Weinberger, Sherry A McKee, Carolyn M Mazure

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea H WeinbergerDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06519, USA. andrea.weinberger@yale.edu
Sherry A McKee
Carolyn M Mazure

Funding

SUBSTANCE ABUSEK12DA000167 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHANIE S O'MALLEY, Marc N Potenza · 1991 to 2026
$17.7M
Tobacco Dependence &Risk Factors for Treatment FailureP50AA015632 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MAKUCH, ROBERT W. · 2004 to 2008
$9.2M
Modeling Stress-Precipitated Smoking Lapse for Medication Development (9 of 14)RL1DA024857 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MCKEE, SHERRY ANN · 2007 to 2011
$1.3M
NIAAA NIH HHS P50-AA015632-109002NIDA NIH HHS K12-DA000167NIDA NIH HHS RL1 DA024857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe higher prevalence and cost of depression for women compared with men and the possible gender differences in treatment response demand the inclusion of women in clinical trials of depression treatments. The 1993 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Revitalization Act set a new standard, requiring investigators to consider the inclusion of women and analyze outcomes by gender, yet compliance with these standards in depression research has not been examined systematically. The purpose of this study is to examine the inclusion of women and gender-specific analyses in recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for depression.

methodsRCTs were identified through a MEDLINE search for trials published between January 1 and December 31, 2007, and a Clinicaltrials.gov search of self-identified interventional studies to treat depression.

resultsOf the 150 RCTs for depression published in 2007, 15% did not report the gender composition of their sample, 50% of studies did not analyze outcomes by gender, and 12% controlled for gender but did not analyze for gender differences. Of the 768 trials reviewed on Clinicaltrials.gov, 89% reported recruiting male and female participants, yet <1% reported an intention to analyze results by gender.

conclusionsMany recent studies of depression treatments include women but do not examine outcomes by gender. Understanding how women differ from men in response to treatment is critical for enhancing treatment efficacy for the greatest number of adults with depression.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdultDepressionDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansMalePatient SelectionSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID20799923
PMCPMC2936499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.