Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20799041›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2011

Therapeutic options for treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma.

Kathrin Gessner, Gunnar Wichmann, Andreas Boehm, Anett Reiche, Julia Bertolini, Johannes Brus, Ina Sterker, Stefan Dietzsch, Andreas Dietz

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Merkel cell carcinoma: an illustrative case and review.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kathrin GessnerDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 10-14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. kathrinnora.gessner@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
Gunnar Wichmann
Andreas Boehm
Anett Reiche
Julia Bertolini
Johannes Brus
Ina Sterker
Stefan Dietzsch
Andreas Dietz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare malignant neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin. Owing to the aggressiveness of this tumor and the bad overall survival, we reviewed the therapeutic strategies, including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy to find out the potentially best treatment option for one patient treated at our hospital. In addition, we investigated MCC biopsies using the FLAVINO assay to find out if individual chemoresponse testing might be a useful supplement in decision-making for the optimal therapeutic option for our MCC patient. The different results achieved using cisplatin, docetaxel, and cetuximab led to the conclusion that an individual chemoresponse testing in a predictive short-time assay might potentially be a useful diagnostic tool in identifying potentially effective chemotherapy treatments.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Merkel CellCisplatinFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNose NeoplasmsSkin NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.