ArticleDer Nervenarzt2010
[Guideline intentions of the German Society of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Nervous Diseases (DGPPN)].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effects of a clinical care pathway for schizophrenia: a before and after study in 114 patients.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2012Trial
- [Treatment pathways in the care of patients with schizophrenia and depression].Der Nervenarzt · 2015Review
- [National and international schizophrenia guidelines. Update 2013 regarding recommendations about antipsychotic pharmacotherapy].Der Nervenarzt · 2013Review
- [A new evidence and consensus-based German guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of bipolar disorders].Der Nervenarzt · 2012Article
- [Responsible dealing with sexuality. Recommendations in a clinical institution].Der Nervenarzt · 2012Article
- [Treatment of Alzheimer's disease according to the S3 guidelines on dementia. Choline esterase inhibitors for all and for ever?].Der Nervenarzt · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The practice guidelines of the German Society of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Nervous Diseases (DGPPN) include systematically developed and evidence-based treatment recommendations which assist clinicians and patients in making decisions about appropriate treatment for specific conditions. The intentions of practice guidelines are to improve the quality of care and the outcome of mental diseases. This paper describes the methodology behind the development of the guidelines and lists the already existing practice guidelines as well as the guidelines actually being developed. In addition, it is outlined how quality indicators may be derived from guidelines. A major aim of the German Society of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Nervous Diseases (DGPPN) is to assure the quality of inpatient and outpatient care of the mentally ill by developing evidence-based consensus guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20798916What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.