Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20798196›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2010

Quality of life in hormone receptor-positive HER-2+ metastatic breast cancer patients during treatment with letrozole alone or in combination with lapatinib.

Beth Sherrill, Mayur M Amonkar, Bintu Sherif, Julie Maltzman, Lisa O'Rourke, Stephen Johnston

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00073528 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Phase III Study Comparing GW572016 and Letrozole Versus Letrozole in Subjects With Estrogen/Progesterone Receptor- Positive Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00073528 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Phase III Study Comparing GW572016 and Letrozole Versus Letrozole in Subjects With Estrogen/Progesterone Receptor- Positive Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2003 to 2018Enrolled1,286ConditionsBreast NeoplasmsArmsLapatinib, Letrozole, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in breast cancer (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Beth SherrillRTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2194, USA. bsherrill@rti.org
Mayur M Amonkar
Bintu Sherif
Julie Maltzman
Lisa O'Rourke
Stephen Johnston
GlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USGlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBResearch Triangle Park Foundation · USRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBRTI Health Solutions · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA phase III trial compared lapatinib plus letrozole (L + Let) with letrozole plus placebo (Let) as first-line therapy for hormone receptor (HR)(+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) in patients whose tumors were human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2(+) was significantly longer for L + Let than for Let (8.2 months versus 3 months; p = .019). This analysis focuses on quality of life (QOL) in the HER-2(+) population.

methodsQOL was assessed at screening, every 12 weeks, and at withdrawal using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B). Changes from baseline were analyzed and the proportions of patients achieving minimally important differences in QOL scores were compared. Additional exploratory analyses evaluated how QOL changes reflected tumor progression status.

resultsAmong the 1,286 patients randomized, 219 had HER-2(+) tumors. Baseline QOL scores were comparable in the two arms. Mean changes in QOL scores were generally stable over time for patients who stayed on study. The average change from baseline on the FACT-B total score in both arms was positive at all scheduled visits through week 48. There was no significant difference between the two treatment arms in the percentage of QOL responders.

conclusionThe addition of lapatinib to letrozole led to a significantly longer PFS interval while maintaining QOL during treatment, when compared with letrozole alone, thus confirming the clinical benefit of the combination therapy in the HR(+) HER-2(+) MBC patient population. This all oral regimen provides an effective option in this patient population, delaying the need for chemotherapy and its accompanying side effects.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalDouble-Blind MethodErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansLapatinibLetrozoleNitrilesQuinazolinesTriazolesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesLapatinibLetrozoleNitrilesQuinazolinesTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID20798196
PMCPMC3228031
OpenAlexW2138922782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.