Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20798021›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2010

Secondhand tobacco smoke in bars and restaurants in Santiago, Chile: evaluation of partial smoking ban legislation in public places.

Marcia Erazo, Veronica Iglesias, Andrea Droppelmann, Marisol Acuña, Armando Peruga, Patrick N Breysse, Ana Navas-Acien

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05016505 (A Randomized Controlled Trial to Support Smoke-Free Policy Compliance in Public Housing), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05016505 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Support Smoke-Free Policy Compliance in Public Housing

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled405ConditionsSmoking, Smoking Cessation, Smoking Reduction, Smoking BehaviorsArmsReduction (relocation and reduction of personal smoking) and cessation, Resident Endorsement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Protecting the world from secondhand tobacco smoke exposure: where do we stand and where do we go from here?Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2013
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Correlates of chilean adolescents' negative attitudes toward cigarettes: the role of gender, peer, parental, and environmental factors.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2012
    Article
  19. A cost-effectiveness analysis of India's 2008 prohibition of smoking in public places in Gujarat.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2011
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Marcia ErazoFaculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile. merazo@med.uchile.cl
Veronica Iglesias
Andrea Droppelmann
Marisol Acuña
Armando Peruga
Patrick N Breysse
Ana Navas-Acien
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Chile · CLInstituto de Salud Pública de Chile · CLMinistry of Health · CLWorld Health Organization - Pakistan · PK

Funding

Respiratory, reproductive, and other effects of air pollution and high altitudeD43TW005746 · FIC · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEENLAND, NELSON K · 2001 to 2012
$1.9M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW005746FIC NIH HHS D43 TW 05746-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare air nicotine concentrations according to the smoking policy selected by bars/restaurants in Santiago, Chile before and after the enactment of partial smoking ban legislation in 2007 (establishments could be smoke free, have segregated (mixed) smoking and non-smoking areas, or allow smoking in all areas).

methodsThe study measured air nicotine concentrations over 7 days to characterise secondhand smoke exposure in 30 bars/restaurants in 2008. Owner/manager interviews and physical inspections were conducted.

resultsMedian IQR air nicotine concentrations measured in all venues were 4.38 (0.61-13.62) μg/m(3). Air nicotine concentrations were higher in bars (median 7.22, IQR 2.48-15.64 μg/m(3)) compared to restaurants (1.12, 0.15-9.22 μg/m(3)). By smoking status, nicotine concentrations were higher in smoking venues (13.46, 5.31-16.87 μg/m(3)), followed by smoking areas in mixed venues (9.22, 5.09-14.90 μg/m(3)) and non-smoking areas in mixed venues (0.99, 0.19-1.27 μg/m(3)). Air nicotine concentrations were markedly lower in smoke-free venues (0.12, 0.11-0.46 μg/m(3)). After adjustment for differences in volume and ventilation, air nicotine concentrations were 3.2, 35.5 and 56.2 times higher in non-smoking areas in mixed venues, smoking areas in mixed venues and smoking venues, respectively, compared to smoke-free venues.

conclusionsExposure to secondhand smoke remains high in bars and restaurants in Santiago, Chile. These findings demonstrate that the partial smoking ban legislation enacted in Chile in 2007 provides no protection to employees working in those venues. Enacting a comprehensive smoke-free legislation which protects all people from exposure to secondhand smoke in all public places and workplaces is urgently needed.

Indexed as

RestaurantsAirAir Pollution, IndoorChileHumansInhalation ExposureNicotinePolicySmokingSmoking PreventionTobacco Smoke PollutionWorkplaceNicotineTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID20798021
PMCPMC2991072
OpenAlexW2122780243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.