Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20797950›Full record

ArticleOncology nursing forum2010

Exploring disparities and variability in perceptions and self-reported colorectal cancer screening among three ethnic subgroups of U. S. Blacks.

Clement K Gwede, Claire M William, Kamilah B Thomas, Will L Tarver, Gwendolyn P Quinn, Susan T Vadaparampil, Jongphil Kim, Ji-Hyun Lee, Cathy D Meade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology nursing forum, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Black Heterogeneity in Cancer Mortality: US-Blacks, Haitians, and Jamaicans.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center · 2016
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Regional, racial, and gender differences in colorectal cancer screening in middle-aged African-Americans and Whites.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Clement K GwedeH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA. clement.gwede@moffitt.org
Claire M William
Kamilah B Thomas
Will L Tarver
Gwendolyn P Quinn
Susan T Vadaparampil
Jongphil Kim
Ji-Hyun Lee
Cathy D Meade

Funding

Tampa Bay Community Cancer Network (TB-CCN): A Model fo*U01CA114627 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR &RES INST · PI MEADE, CATHY D. · 2005 to 2009
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS 3U01CA 114627-03NCI NIH HHS 3U01CA 114627-03S1NCI NIH HHS U01 CA114627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE/

objectivesTo explore perceptions of colorectal cancer (CRC) and self-reported CRC screening behaviors among ethnic subgroups of U. S. blacks.

designDescriptive, cross-sectional, exploratory, developmental pilot.

settingMedically underserved areas in Hillsborough County, FL. SAMPLE: 62 men and women aged 50 years or older. Ethnic subgroup distribution included 22 African American, 20 English-speaking Caribbean-born, and 20 Haitian-born respondents.

methodsCommunity-based participatory research methods were used to conduct face-to-face individual interviews in the community. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Ethnic subgroup, health access, perceptions of CRC (e.g., awareness of screening tests, perceived risk, perceived barriers to screening), healthcare provider recommendation, and self-reported CRC screening.

findingsAwareness of CRC screening tests, risk perception, healthcare provider recommendation, and self-reported use of screening were low across all subgroups. However, only 55% of Haitian-born participants had heard about the fecal occult blood test compared to 84% for English-speaking Caribbean-born participants and 91% for African Americans. Similarly, only 15% of Haitian-born respondents had had a colonoscopy compared to 50% for the English-speaking Caribbean and African American subgroups.

conclusionsThis exploratory, developmental pilot study identified lack of awareness, low risk perception, and distinct barriers to screening. The findings support the need for a larger community-based study to elucidate and address disparities among subgroups. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses play a major role in reducing cancer health disparities through research, education, and quality care. Recognition of the cultural diversity of the U. S. black population can help nurses address health disparities and contribute to the health of the community.

Indexed as

EthnicityHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAgedBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleCaribbean RegionColorectal NeoplasmsCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHaitiHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNurse's Role

Identifiers

PMID20797950
PMCPMC2946332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.