Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20796301›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2010

Review of Alzheimer's disease scales: is there a need for a new multi-domain scale for therapy evaluation in medical practice?

Philippe Robert, Steven Ferris, Serge Gauthier, Ralf Ihl, Bengt Winblad, Frank Tennigkeit

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03770182 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Brain Stimulation for Neurological Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorStorz Medical AGRan2017 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsAlzheimer DiseaseArmsNEUROLITH
NCT05153941 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

DNS Cohort Study Aimed at Understanding the Pathophysiology of AD and AD Related Disorders (ADRD)

TypeobservationalSponsorAltoidaRan2022 to 2030Enrolled3,500ConditionsAlzheimer's Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Shortening the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale cognitive subscale.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Philippe RobertMemory Center, CHU - University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Hôpital de Cimiez, 4 av Victoria, 06000 Nice, France. phil.robert15@orange.fr.
Steven Ferris
Serge Gauthier
Ralf Ihl
Bengt Winblad
Frank Tennigkeit

Funding

PSYCHOSOCIAL COREP30AG008051 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SHAO, YONGZHAO · 1990 to 2019
$36.1M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG008051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe present review of Alzheimer's disease (AD) rating scales aims to outline the need for a new rating scale to be used in routine clinical practice for long-term medical care of AD patients. An ideal scale would be: 1) practical, easy and quick to administer for an experienced clinician; 2) validated for AD; 3) multi-domain: covering the AD-relevant areas of cognition, activities of daily living, behavior, communication/social interaction, and quality of life; 4) applicable to all AD severity stages; 5) able to monitor disease progression; and 6) sensitive to measure therapy effects.

methodsThe National Library of Medicines' MEDLINE database was searched for the years 1981 to September 2008, using a set of keywords aiming to select instruments which cover at least some of the requirements for an ideal practical AD scale for therapy evaluation. Measures for AD staging and screening tests were not considered for review.

resultsOf 1,902 articles resulting from the literature search, 68 relevant AD scales were identified. Most of them were scales that predominantly measure the severity of major dysfunctions in particular AD domains. Only five scales met some of the requirements for a practical multi-domain AD scale, but did not possess all required characteristics.

conclusionsDespite the multitude of AD scales for various purposes, there remains a need for a new multi-domain and easy to administer AD scale for assessment of disease progression and response to therapy in daily medical practice.

Identifiers

PMID20796301
PMCPMC2949590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.