Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20740303›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2010

Intracranial meningiomas of atypical (WHO grade II) histology.

Leland Rogers, Mark Gilbert, Michael A Vogelbaum

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Prediction of Meningioma WHO Grade Using PET Findings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. High-risk Meningioma: Initial Outcomes From NRG Oncology/RTOG 0539.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2020
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Meningioma recurrence: Time for an online prediction tool?Surgical neurology international · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. De Novo Skull Base Atypical Meningioma: Incidence and Outcome.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2023
    Article
  18. Genomic Landscape of Meningiomas.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  19. Meningioma and Other Meningeal Tumors.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leland RogersGammaWest Cancer Services, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Leland@GammaWest.com
Mark Gilbert
Michael A Vogelbaum

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atypical (WHO grade II) meningiomas occupy an intermediate risk group between benign (WHO grade I) and anaplastic (WHO grade III) meningiomas. Although grade II meningiomas have traditionally been recognized in only about 5% of cases, after changes in diagnostic criteria with the current 2007 WHO standards, they now comprise approximately 20-35% of all meningiomas. Given the magnitude of this change, much work is now needed to solidify the adoption of these standards, to render inter-observer and inter-institutional comparisons more uniform, and to more carefully define the incidence of grade II histology. However, it is clear that they carry a several-fold increased risk of recurrence, as well as an increased rate of mortality. We will discuss the definition, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with atypical meningioma; review the current phase II cooperative trials; and draw attention to some questions timely for pre-clinical and clinical research.

Indexed as

HumansMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.