ArticleNature neuroscience2010
Zooming in on mouse vision.
Article in Nature neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- New Features of Receptive Fields in Mouse Retina through Spike-triggered Covariance.Experimental neurobiology · 2020Article
- Age-related changes of corneal endothelial cell in healthy Chinese tree shrew measured by non-contact specular microscope.International journal of ophthalmology · 2017Article
- A Comparative Analysis of the Endocannabinoid System in the Retina of Mice, Tree Shrews, and Monkeys.Neural plasticity · 2016Article
- Parasol cell mosaics are unlikely to drive the formation of structured orientation maps in primary visual cortex.Visual neuroscience · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
An examination of the micro-organization of visual cortex using two-photon calcium imaging provides a new level of insight into retinotopic maps, finding that retinotopy is scrambled on fine scales in mouse primary visual cortex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.