Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20739852›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2010

A statewide assessment of surgical site infection following colectomy: the role of oral antibiotics.

Michael J Englesbe, Linda Brooks, James Kubus, Martin Luchtefeld, James Lynch, Anthony Senagore, John C Eggenberger, Vic Velanovich, Darrell A Campbell

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for colorectal surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Effect of Inclusion of Oral Antibiotics with Mechanical Bowel Preparation on the Risk of Clostridium Difficile Infection After Colectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michael J EnglesbeDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5331, USA. englesbe@umich.edu
Linda Brooks
James Kubus
Martin Luchtefeld
James Lynch
Anthony Senagore
John C Eggenberger
Vic Velanovich
Darrell A Campbell

Funding

Towards Pay for Performance in Kidney TransplantationK08DK082758 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ENGLESBE, MICHAEL JOSEPH · 2009 to 2013
$624k
NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK0827508NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK082758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the utility of adding oral nonabsorbable antibiotics to the bowel prep prior to elective colon surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Bowel preparation prior to colectomy remains controversial. We hypothesized that mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics (compared with without) was associated with lower rates of surgical site infection (SSI).

methodsTwenty-four Michigan hospitals participated in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative-Colectomy Best Practices Project. Standard perioperative data, bowel preparation process measures, and Clostridium difficile colitis outcomes were prospectively collected. Among patients receiving mechanical bowel preparation, a logistic regression model generated a propensity score that allowed us to match cases differing only in whether or not they had received oral antibiotics.

resultsOverall, 2011 elective colectomies were performed over 16 months. Mechanical bowel prep without oral antibiotics was administered to 49.6% of patients, whereas 36.4% received a mechanical prep and oral antibiotics. Propensity analysis created 370 paired cases (differing only in receiving oral antibiotics). Patients receiving oral antibiotics were less likely to have any SSI (4.5% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.0001), to have an organ space infection (1.8% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.044) and to have a superficial SSI (2.6% vs. 7.6%, P = 0.001). Patients receiving bowel prep with oral antibiotics were also less likely to have a prolonged ileus (3.9% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.011) and had similar rates of C. difficile colitis (1.3% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.58).

conclusionsMost patients in Michigan receive mechanical bowel preparation prior to elective colectomy. Oral antibiotics may reduce the incidence of SSI.

Indexed as

ColectomyAdministration, OralAgedAlgorithmsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCatharticsChi-Square DistributionFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMichiganProspective StudiesRegression AnalysisRisk FactorsSurgical Wound InfectionAnti-Bacterial AgentsCathartics

Identifiers

PMID20739852
PMCPMC2997819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.