Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20739535›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2010

Novel Nipah virus immune-antagonism strategy revealed by experimental and computational study.

Jeremy Seto, Liang Qiao, Carolin A Guenzel, Sa Xiao, Megan L Shaw, Fernand Hayot, Stuart C Sealfon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Immunobiology of Nipah Virus.Microorganisms · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Nano-based approach to combat emerging viral (NIPAH virus) infection.Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Kinetic Modeling of Virus Growth in Cells.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeremy SetoCenter for Translational Systems Biology, Department of Neurology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1 Gustave Levy Place, Box 1137, Annenberg Building 14-94B, Box 1137, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Liang Qiao
Carolin A Guenzel
Sa Xiao
Megan L Shaw
Fernand Hayot
Stuart C Sealfon
Center for Systems Biology · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

PHS HHS HHSN266200500021C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nipah virus is an emerging pathogen that causes severe disease in humans. It expresses several antagonist proteins that subvert the immune response and that may contribute to its pathogenicity. Studies of its biology are difficult due to its high pathogenicity and requirement for biosafety level 4 containment. We integrated experimental and computational methods to elucidate the effects of Nipah virus immune antagonists. Individual Nipah virus immune antagonists (phosphoprotein and V and W proteins) were expressed from recombinant Newcastle disease viruses, and the responses of infected human monocyte-derived dendritic cells were determined. We developed an ordinary differential equation model of the infectious process that that produced results with a high degree of correlation with these experimental results. In order to simulate the effects of wild-type virus, the model was extended to incorporate published experimental data on the time trajectories of immune-antagonist production. These data showed that the RNA-editing mechanism utilized by the wild-type Nipah virus to produce immune antagonists leads to a delay in the production of the most effective immune antagonists, V and W. Model simulations indicated that this delay caused a disconnection between attenuation of the antiviral response and suppression of inflammation. While the antiviral cytokines were efficiently suppressed at early time points, some early inflammatory cytokine production occurred, which would be expected to increase vascular permeability and promote virus spread and pathogenesis. These results suggest that Nipah virus has evolved a unique immune-antagonist strategy that benefits from controlled expression of multiple antagonist proteins with various potencies.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalDendritic CellsHumansImmune SystemNipah VirusPhosphoproteinsRNA EditingTime FactorsViral ProteinsViral Structural ProteinsPhosphoproteinsViral ProteinsViral Structural ProteinsV protein, Nipah virusW protein, Nipah virus

Identifiers

PMID20739535
PMCPMC2953155
OpenAlexW2117075307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.