Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20739520›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2010

Pathogenesis of hepatitis E virus and hepatitis C virus in chimpanzees: similarities and differences.

Claro Yu, Denali Boon, Shannon L McDonald, Timothy G Myers, Keiko Tomioka, Hanh Nguyen, Ronald E Engle, Sugantha Govindarajan, Suzanne U Emerson, Robert H Purcell

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Hepatitis E virus: from innate sensing to adaptive immune responses.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024
    Review
  8. Biomarkers in Detection of Hepatitis C Virus Infection.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Immunobiology and Host Response to HEV.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Hepatitis E Virus Immunopathogenesis.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claro YuLaboratory of Infectious Diseases, 50 South Drive, Bldg. 50, Rm. 6523, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-8009, USA.
Denali Boon
Shannon L McDonald
Timothy G Myers
Keiko Tomioka
Hanh Nguyen
Ronald E Engle
Sugantha Govindarajan
Suzanne U Emerson
Robert H Purcell
National Institutes of Health · USRancho Research Institute · US

Funding

Pathogenesis Of Enteric Viral HepatitisZIAAI000915 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI PURCELL, ROBERT H. · 2009 to 2012
$3.9M
Pathogenesis of Parenteral Viral HepatitisZIAAI001015 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI PURCELL, ROBERT H. · 2009 to 2012
$3.0M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chimpanzee is the only animal model for investigating the pathogenesis of viral hepatitis types A through E in humans. Studies of the host response, including microarray analyses, have relied on the close relationship between these two primate species: chimpanzee samples are commonly tested with human-based reagents. In this study, the host responses to two dissimilar viruses, hepatitis E virus (HEV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), were compared in multiple experimentally infected chimpanzees. Affymetrix U133+2.0 human microarray chips were used to assess the entire transcriptome in serial liver biopsies obtained over the course of the infections. Respecting the limitations of microarray probes designed for human target transcripts to effectively assay chimpanzee transcripts, we conducted probe-level analysis of the microarray data in conjunction with a custom mapping of the probe sequences to the most recent human and chimpanzee genome sequences. Time points for statistical comparison were chosen based on independently measured viremia levels. Regardless of the viral infection, the alignment of differentially expressed genes to the human genome sequence resulted in a larger number of genes being identified when compared with alignment to the chimpanzee genome sequence. This probably reflects the lesser refinement of gene annotation for chimpanzees. In general, the two viruses demonstrated very distinct temporal changes in host response genes, although both RNA viruses induced genes that were involved in many of the same biological systems, including interferon-induced genes. The host response to HCV infection was more robust in the magnitude and number of differentially expressed genes compared to HEV infection.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAnimalsGenomeGenome, HumanHepacivirusHepatitis E virusHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPan troglodytesSequence AlignmentTime FactorsViremia

Identifiers

PMID20739520
PMCPMC2953165
OpenAlexW2042735386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.