Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20739411›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2010

Cell biology of prokaryotic organelles.

Dorothee Murat, Meghan Byrne, Arash Komeili

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The relevance of chromatin architecture to genome rearrangements inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. A synthetic bacterial microcompartment as production platform for pyruvate from formate and acetate.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dorothee MuratDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720-3102, USA.
Meghan Byrne
Arash Komeili

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms of Organelle Assembly by the Prokaryotic Actin Homolog MamKR01GM084122 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI KOMEILI, ARASH · 2009 to 2017
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mounting evidence in recent years has challenged the dogma that prokaryotes are simple and undefined cells devoid of an organized subcellular architecture. In fact, proteins once thought to be the purely eukaryotic inventions, including relatives of actin and tubulin control prokaryotic cell shape, DNA segregation, and cytokinesis. Similarly, compartmentalization, commonly noted as a distinguishing feature of eukaryotic cells, is also prevalent in the prokaryotic world in the form of protein-bounded and lipid-bounded organelles. In this article we highlight some of these prokaryotic organelles and discuss the current knowledge on their ultrastructure and the molecular mechanisms of their biogenesis and maintenance.

Indexed as

CytoskeletonLipid BilayersMagnetosomesMagnetospirillumOrganellesProkaryotic CellsLipid Bilayers

Identifiers

PMID20739411
PMCPMC2944366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.