Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20738858›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical science2010

Genetic susceptibility to advanced retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

Barkur S Shastry

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical science, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Concurrent Wagner syndrome and retinopathy of prematurity.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Wnt Signaling in vascular eye diseases.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Risk factors for retinopathy of prematurity: insights from outlier infants.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Retinopathy of prematurity.Lancet (London, England) · 2013
    Review
  19. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene promoter polymorphism (T-786C) may be associated with advanced retinopathy of prematurity.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2013
    Article
  20. Lack of association of VEGF gene 3'- UTR polymorphisms (C702T, C936T and G1612A) and the risk of developing advanced retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Barkur S ShastryDepartment of Biological Sciences, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA. shastry@oakland.edu
Oakland University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a vascular vitreoretinopathy that affects infants with short gestational age and low birth-weight. The condition is a multifactorial disease and is clinically similar to familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR), which is a bilateral hereditary eye disorder affecting full-term infants. Both of them are characterized by the abnormal vessel growth in the vitreous that can lead to vitreoretinal traction, retinal detachment and other complications resulting in blindness. Despite the recent advances in diagnosis and treatment, ROP remains a major cause of childhood blindness in developed countries. The etiology of pathogenesis of advanced ROP is currently unknown. In the past, many causative factors such as length of time exposed to supplemental oxygen, excessive ambient light exposure and hypoxia have been suggested but evidence for these as independent risk factors in recent years is not compelling. It is not clear why ROP in a subset of infants with low birth-weight progresses to a severe stage (retinal detachment) despite timely intervention whereas in other infants with similar clinical characteristics ROP regresses spontaneously. Recent research with candidate gene approach, higher concordance rate in monozygotic twins and other clinical and experimental animal studies, suggest a strong genetic predisposition to ROP besides environmental factors such as prematurity. Three genes, which are involved in the Wnt signaling pathway, are mutated in both FEVR and in a small percentage of ROP disorder. However, none of the genetic factors identified thus far in ROP, account for a substantial number of patient population. Future studies involving genomics, bioinformatics and proteomics may provide a better understanding of the pathophysiology and management of ROP.

Indexed as

Eye ProteinsFrizzled ReceptorsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornLDL-Receptor Related ProteinsLow Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein-5Membrane ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledRetinopathy of PrematurityRisk FactorsSignal TransductionTetraspaninsWnt ProteinsEye ProteinsFrizzled ReceptorsFZD4 protein, humanLDL-Receptor Related ProteinsLow Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein-5LRP5 protein, humanMembrane ProteinsNDP protein, humanNerve Tissue ProteinsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledTetraspaninsTSPAN12 protein, humanWnt Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20738858
PMCPMC2933676
OpenAlexW2162886529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.