Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20737986›Full record

ReviewTexas dental journal2010

Current development of saliva/oral fluid-based diagnostics.

Chih-Ko Yeh, Nicolaos J Christodoulides, Pierre N Floriano, Craig S Miller, Jeffrey L Ebersole, Shannon E Weigum, John McDevitt, Spencer W Redding

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC
In one paragraph

Review in Texas dental journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. An On-Chip Disposable Salivary Glucose Sensor for Diabetes Control.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2016
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Longitudinal Monitoring ofFrontiers in oncology · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chih-Ko YehDepartment of Dental Diagnostic Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, USA.
Nicolaos J Christodoulides
Pierre N Floriano
Craig S Miller
Jeffrey L Ebersole
Shannon E Weigum
John McDevitt
Spencer W Redding

Funding

Effects of Oral Inflammation on the Levels of Salivary Biomarkers of AMIU01DE017793 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MCDEVITT, JOHN T · 2006 to 2012
$13.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE017793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saliva can be easily obtained in medical and non-medical settings, and contains numerous bio-molecules, including those typically found in serum for disease detection and monitoring. In the past two decades, the achievements of high-throughput approaches afforded by biotechnology and nanotechnology allow for disease-specific salivary biomarker discovery and establishment of rapid, multiplex, and miniaturized analytical assays. These developments have dramatically advanced saliva-based diagnostics. In this review, we discuss the current consensus on development of saliva/oral fluid-based diagnostics and provide a summary of recent research advancements of the Texas-Kentucky Saliva Diagnostics Consortium. In the foreseeable future, current research on saliva based diagnostic methods could revolutionize health care.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresHumansLab-On-A-Chip DevicesSalivaBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID20737986
PMCPMC3742318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.