Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20737578›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2010

Autocatalytic maturation, physical/chemical properties, and crystal structure of group N HIV-1 protease: relevance to drug resistance.

Jane M Sayer, Johnson Agniswamy, Irene T Weber, John M Louis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Transition states of native and drug-resistant HIV-1 protease are the same.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Critical differences in HIV-1 and HIV-2 protease specificity for clinical inhibitors.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jane M SayerLaboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-0520, USA.
Johnson Agniswamy
Irene T Weber
John M Louis
Georgia State University · USNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases · US

Funding

ACTIVITY OF RESISTANT VARIANTS OF HIV PROTEASER01GM062920 · NIGMS · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WEBER, IRENE T · 2000 to 2012
$3.3M
Inhibition of Resistant Variants of HIV ProteaseU01GM062920 · NIGMS · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HARRISON, ROBERT WILSON, WEBER, IRENE T · 2013 to 2018
$2.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 DK999999NIGMS NIH HHS GM062920NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mature protease from Group N human immunodeficiency virus Type 1 (HIV-1) (PR1(N)) differs in 20 amino acids from the extensively studied Group M protease (PR1(M)) at positions corresponding to minor drug-resistance mutations (DRMs). The first crystal structure (1.09 Å resolution) of PR1(N) with the clinical inhibitor darunavir (DRV) reveals the same overall structure as PR1(M), but with a slightly larger inhibitor-binding cavity. Changes in the 10s loop and the flap hinge propagate to shift one flap away from the inhibitor, whereas L89F and substitutions in the 60s loop perturb inhibitor-binding residues 29-32. However, kinetic parameters of PR1(N) closely resemble those of PR1(M), and calorimetric results are consistent with similar binding affinities for DRV and two other clinical PIs, suggesting that minor DRMs coevolve to compensate for the detrimental effects of drug-specific major DRMs. A miniprecursor (TFR 1-61-PR1(N)) comprising the transframe region (TFR) fused to the N-terminus of PR1(N) undergoes autocatalytic cleavage at the TFR/PR1(N) site concomitant with the appearance of catalytic activity characteristic of the dimeric, mature enzyme. This cleavage is inhibited at an equimolar ratio of precursor to DRV (∼6 μM), which partially stabilizes the precursor dimer from a monomer. However, cleavage at L34/W35 within the TFR, which precedes the TFR 1-61/PR1(N) cleavage at pH ≤ 5, is only partially inhibited. Favorable properties of PR1(N) relative to PR1(M) include its suitability for column fractionation by size under native conditions and >10-fold higher dimer dissociation constant (150 nM). Exploiting these properties may facilitate testing of potential dimerization inhibitors that perturb early precursor processing steps.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAmino Acid SubstitutionCalorimetryCrystallography, X-RayDrug Resistance, ViralElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelEnzyme StabilityEscherichia coliHIV ProteaseHumansKineticsModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence AnnotationMolecular Sequence DataMutationProtein BindingHIV Proteasep16 protease, Human immunodeficiency virus 1Recombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20737578
PMCPMC3005778
OpenAlexW1827102928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.