Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20737232›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2010

A multi-institutional quality improvement initiative to transform education for chronic illness care in resident continuity practices.

David P Stevens, Judith L Bowen, Julie K Johnson, Donna M Woods, Lloyd P Provost, Halsted R Holman, Constance S Sixta, Ed H Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Diabetes management: Influential paradigms.Journal of education and health promotion · 2015
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Patients' experience of chronic illness care in a network of teaching settings.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Improving care in a resident practice for patients with diabetes.Journal of graduate medical education · 2011
    Article
  20. Primary care and primary care training: mirror images.Journal of general internal medicine · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David P StevensCenter for Leadership and Improvement, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA. david.p.stevens@dartmouth.edu
Judith L Bowen
Julie K Johnson
Donna M Woods
Lloyd P Provost
Halsted R Holman
Constance S Sixta
Ed H Wagner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a gap between the need for patient-centered, evidence-based primary care for the large burden of chronic illness in the US, and the training of resident physicians to provide that care.

objectiveTo improve training for residents who provide chronic illness care in teaching practice settings.

designUS teaching hospitals were invited to participate in one of two 18-month Breakthrough Series Collaboratives-either a national Collaborative, or a subsequent California Collaborative-to implement the Chronic Care Model (CCM) and related curriculum changes in resident practices. Most practices focused on patients with diabetes mellitus. Educational redesign strategies with related performance measures were developed for curricular innovations anchored in the CCM. In addition, three clinical measures-HbA1c <7%, LDL <100 mg/dL, and blood pressure <or=130/80-and three process measures-retinal and foot examinations, and patient self-management goals-were tracked.

participantsFifty-seven teams from 37 self-selected teaching hospitals committed to implement the CCM in resident continuity practices; 41 teams focusing on diabetes improvement participated over the entire duration of one of the Collaboratives.

interventionsTeaching-practice teams-faculty, residents and staff-participated in Collaboratives by attending monthly calls and regular 2-day face-to-face meetings with the other teams. The national Collaborative faculty led calls and meetings. Each team used rapid cycle quality improvement (PDSA cycles) to implement the CCM and curricular changes. Teams reported education and clinical performance measures monthly.

resultsPractices underwent extensive redesign to establish CCM elements. Education measures tracked substantial development of CCM-related learning. The clinical and process measures improved, however inconsistently, during the Collaboratives.

conclusionsThese initiatives suggest that systematic practice redesign for implementing the CCM along with linked educational approaches are achievable in resident continuity practices. Improvement of clinical outcomes in such practices is daunting but achievable.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareEvidence-Based MedicineQuality ImprovementCaliforniaChronic DiseaseCooperative BehaviorCurriculumEducational StatusEducation, Medical, GraduateFaculty, MedicalHospitals, TeachingHumansInternship and ResidencyPatient-Centered CareProgram DevelopmentProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID20737232
PMCPMC2940442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.