ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2011
Preparation and validation of the first WHO international genetic reference panel for Fragile X syndrome.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Development of a new genetic reference material system based onMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2021Article
- Development of Chinese genetic reference panel for Fragile X Syndrome and its application to the screen of 10,000 Chinese pregnant women and women planning pregnancy.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2020Article
- Assessment of FMR1 triplet repeats in patients affected with mental retardation, fragile X syndrome and primary ovarian insufficiency.Journal of genetics · 2020Article
- Spectral and temporal properties of calls reveal deficits in ultrasonic vocalizations of adult Fmr1 knockout mice.Behavioural brain research · 2017Article
- Sex-specific and genotype-specific differences in vocalization development in FMR1 knockout mice.Neuroreport · 2016Article
- EMQN best practice guidelines for the molecular genetic testing and reporting of fragile X syndrome and other fragile X-associated disorders.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2015Article
- Comparison of Equivalence between Two Commercially Available S499-Phosphorylated FMRP Antibodies in Mice.PloS one · 2015Article
- Biophysical characterization of G-quadruplex forming FMR1 mRNA and of its interactions with different fragile X mental retardation protein isoforms.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2014Article
- A novel assay for evaluating fragile X locus repeats.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2011Article
- Establishment of the first WHO international genetic reference panel for Prader Willi and Angelman syndromes.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2011Article
- The fragile x mental retardation syndrome 20 years after the FMR1 gene discovery: an expanding universe of knowledge.The Clinical biochemist. Reviews · 2011Article
- The Case for Laboratory Developed Procedures: Quality and Positive Impact on Patient Care.Academic pathologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Fragile X syndrome is the most common inherited form of mental retardation. It is caused by expansion of a trinucleotide (CGG)n repeat sequence in the 5' untranslated region of the FMR1 gene, resulting in promoter hypermethylation and suppression of FMR1 transcription. Additionally, pre-mutation alleles in carrier males and females may result in Fragile X tremor ataxia syndrome and primary ovarian insufficiency, respectively. Fragile X is one of the most commonly requested molecular genetic tests worldwide. Quality assessment schemes have identified a wide disparity in allele sizing between laboratories. It is therefore important that clinical laboratories have access to characterized reference materials (RMs) to aid accurate allele sizing and diagnosis. With this in mind, a panel of genotyping RMs for Fragile X syndrome has been developed, which should be stable over many years and available to all diagnostic laboratories. Immortalized cell lines were produced by Epstein-Barr virus transformation of lymphocytes from consenting patients. Genomic DNA was extracted in bulk and RM aliquots were freeze-dried in glass ampoules. Twenty-one laboratories from seventeen countries participated in a collaborative study to assess their suitability. Participants evaluated the samples (blinded, in triplicate) in their routine methods alongside in-house and commercial controls. The panel of five genomic DNA samples was endorsed by the European Society of Human Genetics and approved as an International Standard by the Expert Committee on Biological Standardization at the World Health Organization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.