Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20736327›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2010

Inconsistent labeling of food effect for oral agents across therapeutic areas: differences between oncology and non-oncology products.

Soonmo Peter Kang, Mark J Ratain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Phase IB Study of Selinexor, a First-in-Class Inhibitor of Nuclear Export, in Patients With Advanced Refractory Bone or Soft Tissue Sarcoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Evaluation of food effect on pharmacokinetics of vismodegib in advanced solid tumor patients.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2013
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Lipid-associated oral delivery: Mechanisms and analysis of oral absorption enhancement.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Phase I studies of sirolimus alone or in combination with pharmacokinetic modulators in advanced cancer patients.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2012
    Article
  17. Phase I study of sunitinib and erlotinib in advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2011
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Soonmo Peter KangDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Mark J Ratain

Funding

CLINICAL THERAPEUTICST32GM007019 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Peter Hugh O'Donnell, MARK J RATAIN · 1985 to 2026
$8.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSeveral recent oral oncology drugs were labeled for administration in fasted states despite the fact that food increases their bioavailability. Because this was inconsistent with the principles of oral drug delivery, we hypothesized that there were inconsistencies across therapeutic areas. EXPERIMENTAL

designOral agents approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration from January 2000 to May 2009 were included in our study. Comparison of the food labeling patterns between oncology and non-oncology drugs was made using Fisher's exact test.

resultsOf the 99 drugs evaluated, 34 showed significant food effects on bioavailability. When food markedly enhanced bioavailability, eight out of nine non-oncology drugs were labeled "fed" to take advantage of the food-drug interaction, whereas all oncology drugs (n = 3) were labeled to be administered in "fasted" states (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.01).

conclusionsDrug labeling patterns with respect to food-drug interactions observed with oncology drugs are in contradiction with fundamental pharmacologic principles, as exemplified in the labeling of non-oncology drugs. .

Indexed as

Food-Drug InteractionsAdministration, OralAntineoplastic AgentsArea Under CurveBiological AvailabilityDrug Delivery SystemsDrug LabelingFastingFoodHumansIntestinal AbsorptionPharmaceutical PreparationsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAntineoplastic AgentsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID20736327
PMCPMC2932769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.