Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20735841›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2010

Molecular alterations in key-regulator genes among patients with T4 breast carcinoma.

Bruno Massidda, Mariacristina Sini, Mario Budroni, Francesco Atzori, Mariacristina Deidda, Valeria Pusceddu, Mariateresa Perra, Paola Sirigu, Antonio Cossu, Grazia Palomba and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic and Predictive Value ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Prognostic value of survivin expression in breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Regulation of the metastasis suppressor Nm23-H1 by tumor viruses.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2015
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bruno MassiddaDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Mariacristina Sini
Mario Budroni
Francesco Atzori
Mariacristina Deidda
Valeria Pusceddu
Mariateresa Perra
Paola Sirigu
Antonio Cossu
Grazia Palomba
Mariateresa Ionta
Giuseppe Palmieri
University of Cagliari · ITNational Research Council · ITAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Sassari · ITAzienda Sanitaria Locale Roma 3 · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrognostic factors in patients who are diagnosed with T4 breast carcinomas are widely awaited. We here evaluated the clinical role of some molecular alterations involved in tumorigenesis in a well-characterized cohort of T4 breast cancer patients with a long follow-up period.

methodsA consecutive series of 53 patients with T4 breast carcinoma was enrolled between 1992 and 2001 in Sardinia, and observed up for a median of 125 months. Archival paraffin-embedded tissue sections were used for immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses, in order to assess alterations in expression levels of survivin, p53, and pERK1-2 proteins as well as in amplification of CyclinD1 and h-prune genes. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used for survival assessment and statistical analysis.

resultsOverall, patients carrying increased expression of pERK1-2 (p = 0.027) and survivin (p = 0.008) proteins as well as amplification of h-prune gene (p = 0.045) presented a statistically-significant poorer overall survival in comparison with cases found negative for such alterations. After multivariate analysis, the pathological response to primary chemotherapy and the survivin overexpression in primary carcinoma represented the main parameters with a role as independent prognostic factors in our series.

conclusionsAlthough retrospective, our study identified some molecular parameters with a significant impact on prediction of the response to therapy or prognosis among T4 breast cancer patients. Further large prospective studies are needed in order to validate the use of such markers for the management of these patients.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarrier ProteinsCyclin D1FemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene AmplificationHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesInhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinsIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceItalyBiomarkers, TumorBIRC5 protein, humanCarrier ProteinsCCND1 protein, humanCyclin D1Inhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinsMAPK1 protein, humanMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3Phosphoric Monoester HydrolasesPRUNE1 protein, humanSurvivinTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID20735841
PMCPMC2936331
OpenAlexW2132945199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.