ArticleBMC neurology2010
Feasibility of a mental practice intervention in stroke patients in nursing homes; a process evaluation.
Article in BMC neurology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors affecting the delivery of complex rehabilitation interventions in research with neurologically impaired adults: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Process evaluations in neurological rehabilitation: a mixed-evidence systematic review and recommendations for future research.BMJ open · 2016Pooled it
- Impact of neurologic deficits on motor imagery: a systematic review of clinical evaluations.Neuropsychology review · 2014Pooled it
- Mental practice for treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Whole home exercise intervention for depression in older care home residents (the OPERA study): a process evaluation.BMC medicine · 2014Trial
- Contextual factors influencing complex intervention research processes in care homes: a systematic review and framework synthesis.Age and ageing · 2022Article
- Implementation strategies and outcomes for occupational therapy in adult stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review.Implementation science : IS · 2021Article
- Effect of mental practice using inverse video of the unaffected upper limb in a subject with chronic hemiparesis after stroke.Journal of physical therapy science · 2016Article
- Towards the integration of mental practice in rehabilitation programs. A critical review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2013Review
- Process evaluation of a positive youth development program in Hong Kong based on different cohorts.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWithin a multi-centre randomised controlled trial in three nursing homes, a process evaluation of a mental practice intervention was conducted. The main aims were to determine if the intervention was performed according to the framework and to describe the therapists' and participants' experiences with and opinions on the intervention.
methodsThe six week mental practice intervention was given by physiotherapists and occupational therapists in the rehabilitation teams and consisted of four phases: explanation of imagery, teaching patients how to use imagery, using imagery as part of therapy, and facilitating the patient in using it alone and for new tasks. It had a mandatory and an optional part. Data were collected by means of registration forms, pre structured patient files, patient logs and self-administered questionnaires.
resultsA total of 14 therapists and 18 patients with stroke in the sub acute phase of recovery were involved. Response rates differed per assessment (range 57-93%). Two patients dropped out of the study (total n = 16). The mandatory part of the intervention was given to 11 of 16 patients: 13 received the prescribed amount of mental practice and 12 practiced unguided outside of therapy. The facilitating techniques of the optional part of the framework were partly used. Therapists were moderately positive about the use of imagery in this specific sample. Although it was more difficult for some patients to generate images than others, all patients were positive about the intervention and reported perceived short term benefits from mental practice.
conclusionsThe intervention was less feasible than we hoped. Implementing a complex therapy delivered by existing multi-professional teams to a vulnerable population with a complex pathology poses many challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.