Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20735403›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2010

Ranolazine selectively blocks persistent current evoked by epilepsy-associated Naν1.1 mutations.

Kristopher M Kahlig, Irene Lepist, Kwan Leung, Sridharan Rajamani, Alfred L George

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sodium channel mutationWorld journal of psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ranolazine Attenuates Brain Inflammation in a Rat Model of Type 2 Diabetes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Pharmacogenomics in epilepsy.Neuroscience letters · 2018
    Review
  20. A mutant of theThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristopher M KahligDepartment of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232-0275, USA.
Irene Lepist
Kwan Leung
Sridharan Rajamani
Alfred L George
Gilead Sciences (United States) · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Program in NeurogenomicsT32MH065215 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ROGER J COLBRAN · 2002 to 2026
$6.4M
HEREDITARY DEFECTS IN HUMAN SODIUM CHANNELSR01NS032387 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GEORGE, ALFRED L. · 1994 to 2015
$3.2M
Hereditary Defects in Human Sodium ChannelsR37NS032387 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GEORGE, ALFRED L. · 2003 to 2009
$2.6M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH065215NINDS NIH HHS NS032387NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS032387NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS032387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeMutations of SCN1A, the gene encoding the pore-forming subunit of the voltage-gated sodium channel Na(V) 1.1, have been associated with a spectrum of genetic epilepsies and a familial form of migraine. Several mutant Na(V) 1.1 channels exhibit increased persistent current due to incomplete inactivation and this biophysical defect may contribute to altered neuronal excitability in these disorders. Here, we investigated the ability of ranolazine to preferentially inhibit increased persistent current evoked by mutant Na(V) 1.1 channels. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Human wild-type (WT) and mutant Na(V) 1.1 channels were expressed heterologously in human tsA201 cells and whole-cell patch clamp recording was used to assess tonic and use-dependent ranolazine block. KEY

resultsRanolazine (30 µM) did not affect WT Na(V) 1.1 channel current density, activation or steady-state fast inactivation but did produce mild slowing of recovery from inactivation. Ranolazine blocked persistent current with 16-fold selectivity over tonic block of peak current and 3.6-fold selectivity over use-dependent block of peak current. Similar selectivity was observed for ranolazine block of increased persistent current exhibited by Na(V) 1.1 channel mutations representing three distinct clinical syndromes, generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (R1648H, T875M), severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy (R1648C, F1661S) and familial hemiplegic migraine type 3 (L263V, Q1489K). In vitro application of achievable brain concentrations (1, 3 µM) to cells expressing R1648H channels was sufficient to suppress channel activation during slow voltage ramps, consistent with inhibition of persistent current. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our findings support the feasibility of using selective suppression of increased persistent current as a potential new therapeutic strategy for familial neurological disorders associated with certain sodium channel mutations.

Indexed as

AcetanilidesAnimalsEpilepsyHumansMaleMutationNAV1.1 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelNerve Tissue ProteinsPiperazinesRanolazineRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySodium Channel BlockersSodium ChannelsAcetanilidesNAV1.1 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelNerve Tissue ProteinsPiperazinesRanolazineSCN1A protein, humanScn1a protein, ratSodium Channel BlockersSodium Channels

Identifiers

PMID20735403
PMCPMC3000664
OpenAlexW1548102419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.