Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20732628›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry2010

Autism in fragile X syndrome: a category mistake?

Scott S Hall, Amy A Lightbody, Melissa Hirt, Ava Rezvani, Allan L Reiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Scott S HallCenter for Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5795, USA. hallss@stanford.edu
Amy A Lightbody
Melissa Hirt
Ava Rezvani
Allan L Reiss
Stanford University · US

Funding

NEUROPSYCHIATRIC-MOLECULAR ASSOCIATIONS IN FRAGILE X SYNR01MH050047 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI REISS, ALLAN L · 1993 to 2022
$12.5M
NEUROPSYCHIATRY OF FRAGILE X AND OTHER GENETIC DISORDERSK02MH001142 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI REISS, ALLAN L · 1994 to 2003
$615k
NIMH NIH HHS MH01142NIMH NIH HHS MH50047NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH050047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMany investigators now routinely classify children with fragile X syndrome (FXS) according to whether or not they also meet diagnostic criteria for autism. To determine whether this classification is appropriate, we examined the profiles of autistic behaviors shown by boys and girls with FXS.

methodIndividuals with FXS, aged 5 to 25 years, were assessed on two established measures of autism, the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS).

resultsWe found that 35.1% of boys and 4.3% of girls with FXS scored in the "autism" category on both instruments. Analysis of the symptom profile indicated that both boys and girls with FXS showed lower rates of impairment on communication and reciprocal social interaction items than the reference autism samples on the measures. Furthermore, a regression model showed that IQ was significantly negatively associated with the SCQ total score in both boys and girls with FXS, when controlling for age, medication use, and FMRP levels.

conclusionsThese data suggest that there are significant differences in the profile of social and communicative symptomatology in FXS compared with individuals diagnosed with idiopathic autism. Given these differences, the implementation of standard autism interventions for individuals with FXS may not be optimal. Maintaining the conceptual distinction between FXS (an established biological disease) and idiopathic autism (a phenomenologically defined behavioral disorder) may also facilitate the development of more targeted and thus effective interventions for individuals with FXS in the future.

Indexed as

AdolescentChecklistChildChild Development Disorders, PervasiveChild, PreschoolCommunicationComorbidityDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleFragile X SyndromeHumansIntelligenceMalePersonality AssessmentPsychometricsSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID20732628
PMCPMC2943372
OpenAlexW2022742399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.